September 2012 Archives by date

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Tue Sep 4 16:36:23 EDT 2012
Ending: Thu Sep 27 16:16:26 EDT 2012
Messages: 45

• [oslc-core] ACTION REQUIRED: New OSLC members agreement and workgroup particpant agreements,   Steve K Speicher
• [oslc-core] Should we transition new specs to use dateTimeStamp instead of dateTime   John Arwe
• [oslc-core] Minutes 5 September 2012   Steve K Speicher
• [oslc-core] handling of long URIs, e.g. those in query strings   John Arwe
• [oslc-core] handling of long URIs, e.g. those in query strings   James Conallen
• [oslc-core] Unrecognized content   James Conallen
• [oslc-core] Unrecognized content   Arthur Ryman
• [oslc-core] Unrecognized content   James Conallen
• [oslc-core] Unrecognized content   Frank Budinsky
• [oslc-core] Unrecognized content   Joe Ross
• [oslc-core] Unrecognized content   Ian Green1
• [oslc-core] Unrecognized content   James Conallen
• [oslc-core] Request to Approve OSLC Asset Management V2   Sean Kennedy
• [oslc-core] [oslc-AssetMgmt] Request to Approve OSLC Asset Management V2   Randy Lexvold
• [oslc-core] [oslc-AssetMgmt] Request to Approve OSLC Asset Management V2   Sean Kennedy
• [oslc-core] [Oslc-steeringcommittee] Request to Approve OSLC Asset Management V2   Ersch, Rainer
• [oslc-core] ACTION REQUIRED: New OSLC members agreement andworkgroup particpant agreements,   Olivier Berger
• [oslc-core] [Oslc-steeringcommittee] Request to Approve OSLC Asset Management V2   Mik Kersten
• [oslc-core] [Oslc-steeringcommittee] [oslc-AssetMgmt] Request to Approve OSLC Asset Management V2   Mik Kersten
• [oslc-core] Should we transition new specs to use dateTimeStamp instead of dateTime   Arthur Ryman
• [oslc-core] Unrecognized content   Arthur Ryman
• [oslc-core] Unrecognized content   James Conallen
• [oslc-core] Unrecognized content   Arthur Ryman
• [oslc-core] Unrecognized content   Arthur Ryman
• [oslc-core] Unrecognized content   John Arwe
• [oslc-core] ACTION REQUIRED: New OSLC members agreement andworkgroup particpant agreements,   John Arwe
• [oslc-core] Should we transition new specs to use dateTimeStamp instead of dateTime   John Arwe
• [oslc-core] Unrecognized content   Steve K Speicher
• [oslc-core] Unrecognized content   Steve K Speicher
• [oslc-core] Unrecognized content   James Conallen
• [oslc-core] Minutes 19 September 2012   Steve K Speicher
• [oslc-core] Fw: ACTION-10: W3C Linked Data Platform (LDP) First Editor's Draft is available!   Steve K Speicher
• [oslc-core] [Oslc-steeringcommittee] Request to Approve OSLC Asset Management V2   John Wiegand
• [oslc-core] Updated edition of the OSLC RM V2.0 Specification now FINAL   Ian Green1
• [oslc-core] AUTO: Tack Tong/Toronto/IBM is out of the office. (returning 09/25/2012)   Tack Tong
• [oslc-core] AUTO: Vijay Aggarwal/Austin/IBM is visting a customer. (returning 09/27/2012)   Vijay Aggarwal
• [oslc-core] Should we transition new specs to use dateTimeStamp instead of dateTime   Arthur Ryman
• [oslc-core] Unrecognized content   Arthur Ryman
• [oslc-core] Should we transition new specs to use dateTimeStamp instead of dateTime   John Arwe
• [oslc-core] AUTO: Manjunatha Nadigar is out of the office. (returning 10/09/2012)   Manjunatha Nadigar
• [oslc-core] Should we transition new specs to use dateTimeStamp instead of dateTime   Arthur Ryman
• [oslc-core] Should we transition new specs to use dateTimeStamp instead of dateTime   Steve K Speicher
• [oslc-core] Fw: [Oslc-steeringcommittee] Request to Approve OSLC AssetManagement V2   Sean Kennedy
• [oslc-core] Evolving vocabularies   James Conallen
• [oslc-core] full text search in oslc   Luis Carlos Quintela

Last message date: Thu Sep 27 16:16:26 EDT 2012
Archived on: Sat Feb 3 08:51:16 EST 2018

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...