HistoryViewLinks to this page 2013 May 9 | 08:31 pm

2013 May 8, 6 PM BST / 1 PM EDT / 10 AM PDT
Virtual meeting details
We intend to start the meeting on time. It will absolutely start when everyone is on the phone, or at 5 after, whichever is first.

This is the 11th meeting of the “bootstrapping” OSLC Steering Committee.

Contents


Agenda

1. Press and Analyst plans for the OSLC goes to OASIS [20m]

[review | discuss | vote]

Led by Bola.

2. OSLC Connect 2013 [20m]

[review | discuss]

  • Led by Parham Vasailey, EADS, OSLC Communications UG Lead
    • (Jane Harnad, Manager of Events for OASIS is also in attendance.)
  • See also:

3. Next meetings [15m]

3a June Meeting [5m]

[review]

This will be the first meeting of the OSLC Member Section at OASIS Steering Committee.
Agenda.

3b The various OSLC activities at Innovate [5m]

[review]

At Innovate 2013

3c Best weeks for 3Q meetings [5m]

[discuss]

  • What are the best weeks for StC members in July, August, and September?
    • Sean will create doodles to agree on a date and time in those weeks

Attendees

Steering Committee

  • Rainer Ersch, Senior Research Scientist at Siemens
  • David Ingram, Managing Director at Accenture
  • Andreas Keis, Manager, Software Engineering at EADS Innovation Works UK
  • Mik Kersten, CEO of Tasktop
  • Bola Rotibi, Research Director at Creative Intellect
  • John Wiegand, Distinguished Engineer and Chief Architect for IBM Rational (StC Chairman)

Steering Committee Staff

  • Operations Coordinator, Sean Kennedy, IBM
  • Technical Coordinator, Steve Speicher, IBM

Presenters

  • Parham Vasailey, EADS, OSLC Communications UG Lead

Observers

Minutes

0. OASIS web infrastructure update

  • Scott McGrath: give an update on the web assets
    • Welcome messages from the OASIS website have gone out
    • no join button for the MS, they manually add folks to the roster
    • the StC members are on two rosters: the MS roster + the StC roster
      • MS roster is completely public
      • StC roster visible to only MS participants
    • do need to consider where to do the work, public mailing lists, or somewhere more private
    • oasis-oslc.org will be for the more public-facing things
  • John: let’s put a topic on our June meeting to discuss that

1. Press and Analyst plans for the OSLC goes to OASIS

[review | discuss | vote]

  • Bola
    • overview of the plan
      • TODO: make document available to all
    • want to give the overview and get feedback and (hopefully) support from the StC
    • the analysts call is similar to what we did in February on the OSLC Community webcast
      • important to make a big deal of all the cross-industry support
      • Bola, as an analyst couldn’t present
      • prefer not to have IBM taking the lead, Mik is OK to take the StC lead
      • OASIS will participate
      • hope to get an end user to participate too
      • date/time: May 21, 10 AM EDT
      • other StC members should join the call too
      • presentation for the event to be an update from the one used in Feb, Sean is responsible
      • would like everyone on the call to provide a quote as to why they’re taking part in OSLC and what the benefits they have
  • John: what I hear is that there is a plan, we want the StC to approve, and then work will continue, are there any questions before we get to a vote?
  • Bola: one other piece of info, we’re going to ask OASIS to issue the invitations to the analyst community
    • contact info for that community will be contributed by IBM
    • with the invite coming from OASIS, we think this may raise more interest from analysts
    • if anyone has any particular analysts who they’d like to attend, please forward that information to Sean
  • Bola: when we produce our own press release (or blog) it is important to get quotes from the orgs who’ve assisted us in creating the OASIS member section
  • Rainer: do we have a target date?
    • Sean: yes, we are now settled on May 21 at 10 AM EDT; I will send a HOLD if we’re
  • Dave Ingram: can’t make the 21st personally, I’ll need to check with our press/analyst process to get a quote out there
    • Rainer: that process will apply to us as well, that is a risk for this plan: we may not get the quotes in time
    • Bola: right, even if it doesn’t arrive in time, it is good to start the process because you’ll need it
  • Carol Geyer: there is no problem doing two press releases, we just need to make sure they’re not duplicate
    • our press release, will allow for quotes from everyone who’s joined the OSLC Member Section
  • John: I think we have agreement in principle
    • let’s send out the specific steps in the plan
    • also acknowledge the OASIS press release is separate
    • Sean: if we execute in the open, and allow for folks to “scream and shout” if they have any issues, will that be sufficient
      • John: I think so
    • general agreement

2. OSLC Connect 2013

[review | discuss]

  • Parham: provides background on himself and the Communications UG
  • John: one thing we should figure out is how the Comms UG and the StC should interact on this item
    • Parham: yes
  • Parham:
    • identified that it is time for an event, we’re finding that we’re discussing about this on a regular basis - there is a thirst for information and a growing momentum
    • EU research activities are identifying OSLC as a very interesting and promising integration tech
    • OASIS will be the official organizer
    • Rainer: this list of Org Committee - is it a final list, do we have commitment
      • Parham: this is more the folks who have contributed to where we are
      • Rainer: so this isn’t the program committee, will we have one?
        • Parham: yes, that makes sense
  • Parham: looking at the work plan, you see we’ve done some work, we’re looking for the StC to say it’s good so that we can move forward to executing
    • John: I can’t quite answer the question yet … how big? what are the goals?
    • Bola: me too … to have an event is great, what I’m looking for:
      • size?, one or two days?, budget - where is it coming from?
    • Parham: we’ve got some of this info in the doc, let’s go look at it
  • Parham: the plan is high-level, we do have a detailed checklist from Jane as well
    • back to covering the document: conference title, key goals, target audience
    • John: are we expecting 50, 500, or 5000 people?
      • Parham: we are targeting 40-50 as our minimum
    • back to doc: co-hosting, it is out
      • we investigated going with EclipseCon Europe, but it didn’t work out
      • we do have support from them for promoting our event
    • London is the location that has been identified, more details on which specific venue options exist is to be available for next week
    • we’re planning on a single day event, sometime between Sept 15 and Oct 31
    • costs: 9k Euros, looking for 5 1k Euros sponsors and participants to pay 150 Euros
    • Bola: are you expecting the presenters to pay as well?
      • Parham: for our first event, we were thinking they should
      • Bola: I don’t think it is right
      • Andreas: with such a small group, you could easily have 30% of attendees being speakers
  • Bola: we need to have another meeting
  • Parham: how about I send around the latest document, and what checkpoints we’d like from the StC
  • John: that is good, also come to us with what decisions you expect the StC to make
  • Rainer: let us also have clear direction as to who we need to send emails too
  • Andreas: let us have an active discussion over email; we can’t wait to June
  • Bola: based on past experience, I think the time line is doable
  • Rainer: but we have summer vacation in our way too
    • there is no program committee, you have to call for papers etc.
  • Parham: we’re not doing a professional conference
  • John: I’d like to understand what kind of conference this is:
    • a workshop, an invitational, an open conference
    • they all have different requirements and different time lines

3. Next meetings

  • John: Sean, please send an email so that folks can have an awareness of the upcoming events

Summary

Agreements and Consensus in this meeting

  1. proceed with the AR/PR plan as presented by Bola
    • Sean to send out more details on dates
    • execute “in the open” so that StC members have a chance to give direction as we go
  2. make the first news a blog on open-services.net
    • time for after the OASIS Board minutes are published and before the analyst call

Action Items from this meeting

  1. Sean: add an agenda item for June to cover the topic of OASIS web resources in more detail
  2. Sean: provide more details on dates for the AR/PR plan
  3. Sean: reach out to all MS supporters to request quotes now, in the hopes we’ll have some by the 21st, and the rest in time for the OASIS press release
  4. Parham: send the latest document for OSLC Connect, include time line to checkpoints by the StC, highlight the items that need StC attention
  5. Sean: to send email reminding folks to review the “upcoming meetings” portion of this agenda
    1. also create doodles for 3Q meetings

Future Agenda Topics from this meeting

  1. what are the OASIS web resources, how do we want to use them? (added to the June meeting)

Category:Meeting agendas

Category:Meeting Minutes


Categories