Finding a history of votes in the Mailing List archive is not always easy to do. We surface the results on this page to help with visibility. (Any private votes conducted by email are recorded on the Mailing List Voting Records private page.
New votes are to be added AT THE TOP. (This means that the “Proposal” and “Results” links in the TOC will NOT be stable.)
Contents
Proposal to target the OASIS press release for May 30 (ACCEPTED)
Proposal
Excerpt from the original email from Sean Kennedy:
… the publicity plan I
shared with you yesterday. One area for improvement we’ve identified
is to do the press release on May 30 so that it can be referenced in
press activities at Innovate. This will have an amplifying effect on
the announcement. Doing the release after the news has been spoken
about all week at Innovate may make it a little bit of a denouement
and cause it to be ignored as “old news”.
Update on contingency plan if quotes don’t arrive on time from Carol Geyer of OASIS:
All founding companies will be featured in the subhead of the press
release. All the quotes received by the deadline will be included in
the body of the press release. The release will be distributed via
BusinessWire on 30 May and posted on the OASIS web site. Any quotes we
receive after the deadline can be added to the version on the OASIS
web site.
OASIS standard practice is to give members 10 working days to provide
quotes for press releases. If we schedule the release for 30 May, and
set a quote deadline of 28 May, and we announce the deadline by
tomorrow (14 May), people will have 11 days (although one of those
days is a US holiday), so there is ample time. (We will still be able
to accommodate last-minute quote submissions on 29 May.)
Results
+1s: Rainer, Bola, Mik, John
No response (yet): Andreas, Dave
Proposal to create an OSLC User Group for Mobile (ACCEPTED)
ACCEPTED, 24 April 2013
Proposal
Excerpt from the charter document (original email):
- PURPOSE
- To determine whether new Work Groups need to be formed and which existing Work Group specifications need to be updated to address mobile-specific needs
- Provide liaisons and example scenarios / use cases / user stories to said Work Groups
- Understand where OSLC activity may/should interact with other specifications and governing bodies
- FOUNDERS
- IBM (Charles Rankin, Leigh Williamson)
- PointSource (Stephanie Trunzo, John Cammarata, Andy Ivory)
- ClearBlade (Eric Simone, Aaron Allsbrook)
- (POTENTIALLY) RELATED OSLC SPECIFICATIONS
- Automation
- Quality Management
- Asset Management
Results
+1s: Mik, Rainer, Dave, John
No response: Andreas, Bola
Approval of OSLC Reconciliation V2.0 (ACCEPTED)
ACCEPTED, 16 April 2013
Proposal
Excerpt from original email:
I’m requesting on behalf of the Reconciliation Working Group an
approval of the OSLC Reconciliation V2 specification to transition to
final by email. The Core WG is satisfied with this specification, an
Implementation Report is available, and a Test Suite plan is in place.
Results
+1s: Rainer, Andreas, Mik, John, Bola
No response: Dave
Proposal to create an OSLC User Group for Embedded Systems (ACCEPTED)
ACCEPTED, 15 April 2013
Proposal
Excerpt from the charter document (original email):
- PURPOSE
- We adopt the broadest scope of Embedded Systems to cover all its application domains & development phases.
- We recognise, however, the need to split this user group to more focused groups as needs and interests of other OSLC User Groups develop. The scope of this User Group will hence be narrowed down in the course of its initial meetings.
- In particular, we will align this User Group with the other new ALM/PLM User Group being formed.
- One of the first activities of the User Group would be to identify use cases and scenarios.
- FOUNDERS
- The Royal Institute of Technology - KTH (Prof. Martin Törngren)
- Siemens Corporate Technology (Rainer Ersch)
- Atego (Hedley Apperly)
- Creative Intellect Consulting Ltd (Bola Rotibi)
- (POTENTIALLY) RELATED OSLC SPECIFICATIONS
- ALM-PLM Interoperability
- Architecture Management
- Automation
- Change Management
- Requirements Management
Results
+1s: Rainer, Andreas, Dave, Bola, Mik
No response: John
Approval of OSLC Automation V2.0 (ACCEPTED)
ACCEPTED, 22 January 2013
Proposal
Excerpt from original email:
I am writing to you requesting your approval to transition OSLC
Automation 2.0 to final specification phase. The Automation WG has
completed the needed requirements (see below), including Core WG
review and approval.
Results
+1s: Rainer, Dave, Mik, Andreas, Bola, John
Proposal to approach vendors about OSLC (ACCEPTED)
ACCEPTED, 19 November 2012
Proposal
Excerpt from original email:
- As already discussed in previous StC meetings, we propose to install a StC focal point for two vendors to begin with
- The two vendors should be Microsoft (TFS team) and Siemens PL.
- The StC members being the focal point for these organizations should first approach them informally, but with the clear mandate of the StC
to figure out what a next engagement step could be (e.g. a more
formal meeting with a StC delegation).
- The proposal is also that John should be the focal point for Siemens PL and Rainer takes this role for Microsoft.
- Based on these experiences, we should later decide how useful this approach is and how to continue
Results
+1 : Dave Ingram, Andreas Keis, Rainer Ersch, Mik Kersten, Bola Rotibi,
No response: John Wiegand
Update
11 December 2012, John Wiegand also +1’ed.
Approval of OSLC Asset Management V2.0 (ACCEPTED)
ACCEPTED, 24 September 2012
Proposal
Excerpt from original email:
let us process the request to approve the OSLC Asset Management V2
specification by email instead of having it as an agenda item for the
September meeting
Results
+1: Rainer Ersch, Mik Kersten, John Wiegand, Andreas Keis
No response: Dave Ingram, Bola Rotibi
Category:Reference documents
