Contents
This document records Implementation Reports for providers and consumers of the OSLC Reconciliation 2.0 specification.
Providers
Product name and version ( TEMPLATE - copy this section, edit and append )
Contact information:
- Contacts: Your Name ( or many names if multiple contacts )
- Product version number ( indicate approximate future release date if not already released )
Details about support:
- OSLC Reconciliation 2.0
- Indicate if you are a provider or consumer
- Describe how you are exploiting the Reconciliation specification
- List any exceptions or partial support
Table of supported capabilities: See ( get spreadsheet from workgroup lead and fill out )
Additional details about support: (not noted in table)
- List any details about your specific implementation that would not be noted in either the section above or in the spreadsheet
Issues:
- List any issue you have with this specification and note how the workgroup wll resolve
Worked well:
- Describe items that worked well during your implementation
TADDM
Contact information:
- Contacts: Marek Smet, Marcin Luczynski, Jaroslaw Jurowicz, Jacek Dolega
- Product version number: 7.2.2, 7.2.1 FP4
Details about support:
- OSLC Reconciliation 2.0
- TADDM has two providers: Configuration and Change History
- Both providers create shapes that contain CRTV attributes so they can be merge later on.
- TADDM does not have its own query capability.
Table of supported capabilities: See ( get spreadsheet from workgroup lead and fill out )
Additional details about support: (not noted in table)
Issues:
- No issues, however the process of finding common attributes (needed to merge resources) is difficult.
Worked well:
Jazz for Service Management Registry Services
Contact information:
- Contacts: Joe Ross
- Product version number: v 1.1 (GA target is March 2013)
Details about support:
- Implement service providers based on OSLC Reconciliation 2.0
- Reconciliation specification is used to validate incoming data and to create reconciled resource records
- Resource shape syntax has been extended to include identification rules from the reconciliation specification
- Currently don’t support all aspects of OSLC query syntax for all query capabilities.
Table of supported capabilities: See spreadsheet with support details
Additional details about support:
- Registered resources are reconciled using the identification rules in the reconciliation specification
Issues:
Worked well:
- Creating resource shapes from the specification worked well, and we were able to use those resource shapes perform reconciliation on incoming registration records.
Consumers
Product name and version ( TEMPLATE - copy this section, edit and append )
Contact information:
- Contacts: Your Name ( or many names if multiple contacts )
- Product version number ( indicate approximate future release date if not already released )
Details about support:
- OSLC Reconciliation 2.0
- Indicate if you are a provider or consumer
- Describe how you are exploiting the Reconciliation specification
- List any exceptions or partial support
Table of supported capabilities: See File:OSLC_Reconciliation_2.0_Implementation_Report.ods
Additional details about support: (not noted in table)
- List any details about your specific implementation that would not be noted in either the section above or in the spreadsheet
Issues:
- List any issue you have with this specification and note how the workgroup wll resolve
Worked well:
- Describe items that worked well during your implementation
Contact information:
- Contacts: Liu Jing Qiong
- Product version number: v7.7 (planned for Q3 2013)
Details about support:
Additional details about support: Not applicable
Issues:
- No significant issues that were not addressed by the spec.
Worked well:
- We were looking for retrieving application structure information from multiple products without peer-to-peer integration, and this fit our requirement.
