OSLC Core Meeting January 11, 2012

Previous meeting

Link to OSLC Core spec: OslcCoreSpecification

Meeting logistics

How to dial-in to our telecon and login to our screen-sharing session.

Telecon Info

USA Toll-Free: 888-426-6840 USA Caller Paid: 215-861-6239 Participant Code: 3292849

Other numbers: https://www.teleconference.att.com/servlet/glbAccess?process=1&accessCode=3292849&accessNumber=2158616239

Online meeting

For IBM employees, use the following link: http://w3.ibm.com/collaboration/meeting/join/?schedid=4440645 (IBM intranet authentication required)

For people outside IBM, use the following link: http://www.ibm.com/collaboration/meeting/join?id=4440645

Agenda

Review Minutes from December 14

OslcCoreSpecificationV2ImplGuidance - created to help collect some needs that don't fit into specs but are useful impl details

OslcCoreV2Issues - Outstanding issues and proposed updates

• 34: Representing the order of triples in a query response that uses oslc.orderBy
  • any addtional feedback?
• 35 : Buglet in Core 2.0 - non-exemplary(?) use of Change Request
• Onto issue about multi-valued oslc:describes issue by JohnArwe

Specification Versioning Guidance

• Proposal sent to oslc-core by SteveSpeicher

Discussion about requirements for specification authoring - OslcCoreV3Plan

2012 meetings:

• Jan 25 - 3.0 progress

Minutes

Review minutes from 12/14

Reviewed intent for OslcCoreSpecificationV2ImplGuidance and request members to contribute and encourage contribution.

OslcCoreV2Issues - Outstanding issues and proposed updates

• 34: Representing the order of triples in a query response that uses oslc.orderBy
  • any addtional feedback?
  • JohnArwe - talked with implementers to add triples to oslc:ResponseInfo, looking for impl feedback and may not be until March
  • ArthurRyman - no response received
  • SteveSpeicher will place resolution on hold waiting for more impl response and feedback.
• 35 : Buglet in Core 2.0 - non-exemplary(?) use of Change Request
  • Proposal for consideration by JohnArwe, will consider off line review and revist at next meeting
  • Agreement it is supposed to be general resource and not Change Request
• Onto issue about multi-valued oslc:describes issue by JohnArwe
  • Lower bound is 0 since instance shape points to shape and rdf:type is optional
  • Confirmation that the list of oslc:describes is intended to be the union of all rdfs:Class[es] the shape supports
  • Arthur is working on defining the semantics of shapes using SPARQL ASK.
  • Arthur to propose some clarifying text on this.
• Question on whether MikeLoeffler has response from 12/6 response

Specification Versioning Guidance

• Proposal sent to oslc-core by SteveSpeicher
• Concensus on #1 guidance. Ensure workgroups have clear statement on whether there is a previous version.

Discussion about requirements for specification authoring

• No real disagreement on this but not enough time to discuss, taking to the mailing list to discuss

2012 meetings:

• Jan 25 - 3.0 progress

Attendees

SteveSpeicher (chair), PaulMcMahan, PaulSlauenwhite, ArthurRyman, MichaelFiedler, DevangParikh, JimConallen, MikeLoeffler, SheehanAnderson, JohnArwe, NickCrossley, DonCronin?

Did not attend: GrayBachelor, NicholisKruk? , DavidHoney, ChrisLazzaro? , SofiaYeung, RainerErsch, AndyBerner, CharlesRankin, IanGreen