This wiki is locked. Future workgroup activity and specification development must take place at
our new wiki
. For more information, see
this blog post about the new governance model
and
this post about changes to the website
.
TWiki
>
Main Web
>
RmHome
>
RmMeetings
>
RmMeetings20090706
(09 Jul 2009,
IanGreen
)
(raw view)
---+++ Agenda * Scenario discussions * We'll use the web meeting to walk through the scenarios * Need to consider workgroup feedback * Need to consider Brenda's RCR scenario ([[ChangeRequestScenario][Scenario 2B]]. * Specification needs for V1.0 * Meeting schedule during July. * AOB ---++++ Minutes Attendees: Ian, Dominic, Scott, Dave, Andy, Oliver, Rainer, Torge, George, Steve, Randy We reviewed changes to Scenario A, and the proposed changes to Scenario B (to be found [[ChangeRequestScenario2][here]]). The consensus was that the proposed changes to Scenario B were overly specific and introduced terminology (QCR) whose meaning was not clear (is it distinct from "defect"); Rainer felt that RCR was also overly and unncessarily specific. It was agreed that these suggested changes to Scenario B would not be accepted. Steve asked whether scenarios were needed which deal with making the distinction between the various types of "change request". There was some discussion prompted by Dominic and Andy about whether the scenarios and/or the specification should be general or specific. For example, types of trace relationships. Steve and Scott took an action to to take a look at these scenarios and understand the relationship to RM. [img - Steve/Scott can either of you recall the actual action taken - this must be missing something? ] Steve suggested working on scenarios expressly consuming traceability. <br />Rainer proposed that we go ahread into specification with scenarios A & B. These are sufficient to start. All attendees agreed with this proposal. Randy raised a discussion on how Scenario A would work in an agile process; it was agreed that our scenarios should be process-neutral where that makes sense and that we muct consider different styles of development when drawing up scenarios.
E
dit
|
A
ttach
|
P
rint version
|
H
istory
: r3
<
r2
<
r1
|
B
acklinks
|
V
iew topic
|
Ra
w
edit
|
M
ore topic actions
Topic revision: r3 - 09 Jul 2009 - 10:18:52 -
IanGreen
Main
Main Web
Create New Topic
Index
Search
Changes
Notifications
RSS Feed
Statistics
Preferences
Webs
Main
Sandbox
TWiki
Български
Cesky
Dansk
Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
日本語
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Svenska
简体中文
簡體中文
Copyright � by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Contributions are governed by our
Terms of Use
Ideas, requests, problems regarding this site?
Send feedback