Reporting Meeting, 2010-02-22

See Reporting Meetings for meeting logistics.

Agenda and Minutes

Agenda

1. Update on outstanding actions
2. OSLC Core Spec Workgroup
   • OSLC Community Announcement
   • Reporting topics as related to Core Specification
3. Extension to base OSLC resource
   • new properties
   • new non-OSLC defined resource
4. Validation Implementation scenario - TackTong

Outstanding Action Items

• Action Item: TackTong and DragosCojocari to address the new use case based on RSx in spec. Note: Will be done later.
  • Will be tracked as a future item at http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/ReportingHome#future
• Action item: TackTong to sync up with SteveSpeicher on CM's use case on "schema" and align proposal to cover both Reporting and CM use cases.
  • Resource shape is now part of Core Spec. Both Reporting and CM WG will have representation at Core Spec WG. Thus, this action item will be addressed there. Closed.

Minutes

Attendees: JamesMoody, DragosCojocari, SteveSpeicher, ScottBosworth, DaveJohnson, SebRose, ArthurRyman, XiangDongHu, BenjaminWilliams

Regrets: VishyRamaswamy, JoanTouzet, StevePitschke

1. Discussed updates on Action items.

2. A OSLC Core Specification WG is formed. Membership is open and member in the Reporting WG are encouraged to participate.

3. Discussed Reporting topics as related to Core Spec.

4. Reporting Spec. will reference to Core Spec. as appropriate and may put more stringent conditios on top of Core Spec. as deemed required.

5. Reporting has no prior knowledge on domain resources. Thus, custom extensions (custom properties and custom OSLC resources) to OLSC resources are discovered via Resource Shape same as any properties and OSLC resources.

6. ImplementationScenario for the validating Query proposal was presented and discussed. First iteration of the implementation will be based on this scenairo.

Next Week

• Authentication
• Query - what should Reporting say about currently Query proposal.
  • what is the behavior if service provider does not support Query
  • which features of Query are MUST/SHOULD/MAY?

Comments

Add your comments here: