OSLC Core Meeting June 13, 2012
Previous meeting
Link to OSLC Core spec:
OslcCoreSpecification
Meeting logistics
How to dial-in to our telecon and login to our screen-sharing session.
Telecon Info
USA Toll-Free: 888-426-6840 USA Caller Paid: 215-861-6239 Participant Code: 3292849
Other numbers:
https://www.teleconference.att.com/servlet/glbAccess?process=1&accessCode=3292849&accessNumber=2158616239
Online meeting
(when we need it)
For IBM employees, use the following link:
http://w3.ibm.com/collaboration/meeting/join/?schedid=4440645 (IBM intranet authentication required)
For people outside IBM, use the following link:
http://www.ibm.com/collaboration/meeting/join?id=4440645
Agenda
(Proposed)
Review Minutes from
May 30
Update on new WGs
OSLC Steering Committee kickoff & governance changes
OslcCoreV2Issues - Outstanding issues and proposed updates
OslcCoreV2Issues - Issue-43 -
Read-only and friends (Arwe)
- NEW ISSUE - the usage of QName in this context is not valid. It should really state that we use hash URIs and this is the fragment segment of the URI. Need to promote/clarify OSLCCoreURINamingGuidance
- 43-5 : text suggestions made, JohnArwe to produce new recommendation...will follow up on mailing list and at next WG meeting
- 43-8+9 : text still needs some work.. will follow up on mailing list and at next WG meeting
V3 Spec Outline Draft for review -
OslcCoreV3Plan
Next meeting:
- June 27 - outstanding 2.0 issues and 3.0 progress
Minutes
Reviewed minutes from May 30
OSLC Steering Committee and governance updates
- Meeting occurred on June 3rd, overall good meeting
- New members agreement available, can sign but not required yet. Workgroup participants agreement coming.
- Still working out WPA and plan to launch near/late June.
OslcCoreV2Issues - Issue-43 -
Read-only and friends (Arwe)
- Consensus on top-level issue - resource description tables in specs are SHOULDs, in other words implementations MAY contradict the table. SteveSpeicher to send note out to WG
- Reviewed sub-issues and need additional updates -- JohnArwe to provide comeback.
Update on reification of labels alternatives --
looking at using named graphs
- Most agree that named graphs are NOT the right solution
- ACTION to all to provide thoughts/feedback offline
Proposal included for updating link labels, all to review
PATCH support
Attendees
SteveSpeicher (chair),
JimConallen,
SamPadgett,
PaulSlauenwhite,
SheehanAnderson,
NickCrossley,
JohnArwe,
ArthurRyman,
JulianneBielski
Possible attendees:
SteveSpeicher (chair),
MichaelFiedler,
DevangParikh,
PaulMcMahan,
JohnArwe,
PaulSlauenwhite,
NickCrossley,
SamPadgett,
SheehanAnderson,
SuzetteSamoojh? ,
DonCronin? ,
JimConallen,
IanGreen,
GrayBachelor,
NicholisKruk? ,
DavidHoney,
ChrisLazzaro? ,
SofiaYeung,
RainerErsch,
AndyBerner,
CharlesRankin,
MikeLoeffler,
ArthurRyman,
JulianneBielski