This wiki is locked. Future workgroup activity and specification development must take place at our new wiki. For more information, see this blog post about the new governance model and this post about changes to the website.

OSLC Core Meeting March 21, 2012

Previous meeting

Link to OSLC Core spec: OslcCoreSpecification

Meeting logistics

How to dial-in to our telecon and login to our screen-sharing session.

Telecon Info

USA Toll-Free: 888-426-6840 USA Caller Paid: 215-861-6239 Participant Code: 3292849

Other numbers: https://www.teleconference.att.com/servlet/glbAccess?process=1&accessCode=3292849&accessNumber=2158616239

Online meeting

(when we need it)

For IBM employees, use the following link: http://w3.ibm.com/collaboration/meeting/join/?schedid=4440645 (IBM intranet authentication required)

For people outside IBM, use the following link: http://www.ibm.com/collaboration/meeting/join?id=4440645

Agenda

Review Minutes from Feb 22

Community WebCasts Blog updates

http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/2012-March/001239.html[oslc.properties question]]

oslc:modifiedBy proposal

Multi-typed resource scenarios and rdf:type/dcterms:type

Update on reification of labels alternatives

OslcCoreV2Issues - Outstanding issues and proposed updates

V3 Spec Outline Draft for review - OslcCoreV3Plan

2012 meetings:

  • April 4 - 3.0 progress (chair has probable conflict)

Minutes

Community Updates

  • Eclipse Lyo talk moved to 3/22
  • EclipseCon? 2012 and OSLC/Lyo 3/27-29

Issue-39 http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/2012-March/001239.html[oslc.properties question]] * Arthur responded with clarity, client defines the minimal and server can add more * Steve to provide response to Ian plus asking for priority of CBD needs, seems fairly complex. Need to consider clarity update in spec.

Issue-40 oslc:modifiedBy proposal

  • No issues with adding oslc:modifiedBy
  • Further discussion needed on dcterms:contributor and what "contribution" means. Look at some concrete samples with domain spec usage.
  • Action - wait to talk w/ Arthur at next core WG meeting.
  • SheehanAnderson asked about possibility of a "history" resource, indicating the need from Asset WG. Sheehan to produce some scenarios and proposals.

Issue-41 Multi-typed resource scenarios and rdf:type/dcterms:type

  • Work with PaulS? on seeing alternatives with Jena, MikeF? to coordinate a discussion on this.
  • PaulM? says it is easy enough to do.

Update on reification of labels alternatives

  • Steve still working on it, will solicit feedback from RDF WG is needed

Next meeting: April 4

Attendees

Attendees: SteveSpeicher (chair), MichaelFiedler, DevangParikh, PaulMcMahan, SheehanAnderson, JohnArwe, SuzetteSamoojh?

Possible attendees: DonCronin? , SamPadgett, JimConallen, PaulSlauenwhite, IanGreen, GrayBachelor, NicholisKruk? , DavidHoney, ChrisLazzaro? , SofiaYeung, RainerErsch, AndyBerner, CharlesRankin

Regrets: MikeLoeffler, ArthurRyman, NickCrossley,

Topic revision: r6 - 04 Apr 2012 - 20:45:54 - SteveSpeicher
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Copyright � by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Contributions are governed by our Terms of Use
Ideas, requests, problems regarding this site? Send feedback