OSLC Core Meeting September 15, 2010
Last week's meeting
Meeting logistics
See the
OslcCoreMeetings for more information, more dial-in numbers and on-line meeting information.
- Conference Access
- Toll free: 1-866-423-8350
- Toll: 1-719-387-8273
- Participant passcode: 558663
Agenda
Things we did not get to last week:
- Discuss how to finalize Link Guidance
- Assign it a date or a version number?
- Mark it as FINAL or as "in finalization"?
- Lock it down so only 2-3 people can edit?
- Discuss possible next topics for workgroup
- Partial Update and possible collaboration with W3C? SPARQL Protocol Working Group
- Standardization of JSON format, e.g. for application/rdf+json and possible collaboration with existing Talis effort
- Spec "backlog"
- Attachments
- Eventing
- Baselining
- Hierarchical URLs and "staging" URLs
Minutes
Attendees and notes from the meeting
Attendees
Topics discussed
Reviewed changes to link and JSON representation guidance
Action items:
- Dave to fix missing commas in subscribesTo - DONE
- Dave to make examples 2, 3 and 4 semantically the same - DONE
- Dave to add outer RDF context to example 1 - DONE
- Dave to change JSON guidance to state that properties that can be multi-valued are always represented as JSON arrays - DONE
Agreed that Link Guidance should be finalized
Discussed how to finalize Link Guidance
Action items:
- Dave to declare guidance as final, pending changes above
- Dave to move Link Guidance to new URL, remove word DRAFT from title and assign it a release date
- Scott to lock down link guidance document so that only Dave, Steve and Scott can change
Discussed possible next topics for workgroup
Additional items not on above list:
- Adoption activities: test suites, reference implementation
- Content for namespace URIs
- Seed list approach to enable distributed search
- Guidance for multi-typed resources
Action items:
- Dave to write list of next topics, each with explanation, and circulate it amongst workgroups and inside IBM
Discussed criterial for making OSLC Core spec FINAL
Agreed that having three final domain specs is a good criteria