consensus: recommend to relax the definition of this property to: a) allow other domains to define domains and b) define new domain URI for that purpose
Concern that a null value property and non-existent property, need to further elaborate on this scenarios
PaulMcMahan articulated some scenarios needed for PATCH / partial-update such that only certain licensed users can update a limited set of properties, so PUT semantics fail
ACTION: need guidance on handling inverse links (both from resource definition guidance and where it is actually stored in implementations)
ACTION: need for guidance on when correcting "minor" updates based on fixing link updates
Consensus: no issue of change in errata since: a) doesn't break implementations b) within current scope of RM 2.0 spec definition (or clarification). Core to review errata.
ACTION: sets precedence need to consider implications on how this affects downstream changes
Copyright � by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors. Contributions are governed by our Terms of Use Ideas, requests, problems regarding this site? Send feedback