Agenda

• Finalization progress
• Feedback on 2.0 (how we did)
• Collection of implementation reports
• Looking ahead - Discussion around future scenarios (eg Versions, Baselining (eg RmScenariosSiemens))

Minutes

Apologies:DominicTulley, PaulMcMahan, AndyBerner, DaveJohnson, IanGreen, , NicolasKruk, ScottBosworth, JimConallen, IngridJørgensen, SimonWills, BrendaEllis,

Attendees: ScottBosworth, NicolasKruk,BrendaEllis

Minutes: Await completion of implementation reports to validate the specification.

Action on Ian to solicit implementation reports (AM, QM, CM) for both 2.0 and 1.0.

Feedback from consumers during the RM finalization phase suggests that working with the RDF/XML representation is onerous (a "high bar"), and something more web-client-friendly would be preferred. The issue is that application/rdf+xml representation is defined to be any XML serialization of an RDF model and such serializations are quite variable. Containing these variations without an RDF model can be a challange. Workgroup to consider making support of another media-type REQUIRED (for example, JSON or plain XML).

We briefly discussed scenario possibilities for the future, touching on versioning and baselining. Brenda took an action to investigate baselining scenario that crossed domain boundaries (in contrast to Rainer's RmScenariosSiemens, which is RM-centric).