This wiki is locked. Future workgroup activity and specification development must take place at our new wiki. For more information, see this blog post about the new governance model and this post about changes to the website.

Agenda

Updates on Action Items

  • Specification work
    • Example OSLC Defined resources (discovery, requirement, collection)
    • Recent changes- Issue tracking
  • Implementation progress - unconfirmed
    • Rational (DOORS, DOORS RP)
    • Tieto is implementing OSLC RM.
  • Legal

Minutes

Apologies:DominicTulley PaulMcMahan, AndyBerner, DaveJohnson,

Attendees: IanGreen, , NicolasKruk, ScottBosworth, JimConallen, IngridJørgensen, SimonWills, BrendaEllis,

Minutes:

Ingrid: lack of consistency across OSLC providers. Scott: Over time we may need to strengthen this, uniformly across the domain.

Scott: Clarification: Core makes strong statement about RDF/XML and its adoption. Encouraging domain specs to support RDF/XML.

Simon: adding types to names is wrong thing to do. Scott: "no right way" there are tradeoffs - guidance is needed. This is one of the topics for Wed OSLC Core meeting.

Ingrid: Caliber does not have query capability. Her application does not need query at all - delegated picker is enough. Scott: concern that we are becoming lowest common denominator where all things are MAY, not MUST. Jim no query at all severely limits useability. Query is complex - perhaps some subset could be implemented. What should our philosophy be? We are on a slippery slope of requiring "nothing". Jim how about: MUST have one of query or delegated picker. Brenda: shouldn't make decisions based on ease of implemenation for any one tool. Query is "highly desired" but is not a "SHALL". Hard to assess the ramifications.

Providers should be able to document what is non-compliant.

Implementation report from the CM team. Query is dissected.

General discussion about query/MUST. Consensus on MUST for query. Action on Ian to update the specification.

Concern from Ingrid - eg marketing impact.

Simon: query is useful - can we make it incremental. SHOULD then later, a MUST. We could advertise the fact it will become a MUST. Scott - we would regret not having query.

Agreed that query is a MUST.

Agreed that an RM implementation report would be a useful addition to the wiki.

Ingrid - not on calls. Need to resend invites. Action on Ian.

Agreed that Monday PM is good time for all.

Topic revision: r5 - 26 Aug 2010 - 15:17:41 - IanGreen
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Copyright � by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Contributions are governed by our Terms of Use
Ideas, requests, problems regarding this site? Send feedback