This wiki is locked. Future workgroup activity and specification development must take place at our new wiki. For more information, see this blog post about the new governance model and this post about changes to the website.
Agenda
Meeting 7 September 2009 (3PM UTC)- Reviewers' input to specification effort
Minutes Apologies: US staff(National Holiday) Attendees: IanGreen, LachlanMacpherson, TorgeKummerow, SimonWills, KenJackson? , DominicTulley
- Need "Undefined" to be clarified.
- Rename all Factories to Collections
- GET on top-level collection is meaningless: make it Undefined
- Action: need to start thinking about schema. we likely need a small set of required attributes/link types which have an agreed meaning, and a general-purpose, extensible mechanism for providers to all user-defined attributes/link types.
- Remove OPTIONAL link types. Agreed that link types are not to be defined by OSLC RM v1.0.
- Link symmetry: link collections should show all links associated with a requirement, not only those having that requirement as source. Some examples of both cases would be helpful.
- Agreed to close down remaining review comments via email.
- Next meeting: 21st September 2009, 3pm UTC
Topic revision: r3 - 07 Sep 2009 - 16:15:08 - IanGreen
Main Web
Create New Topic
Index
Search
Changes
Notifications
RSS Feed
Statistics
Preferences
Main|
|
Copyright � by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors. Contributions are governed by our Terms of Use
Ideas, requests, problems regarding this site? Send feedback