--
IanGreen - 24 Aug 2009
Notes for meeting on 24th August 2009.
In addition to reviews, the following are known gaps in the specification.
- JSON representations. These need to be defined and examples given. See also Issue 8.
- Should there be a way of requesting a OSLC-RDM-* content type without using Accept headers?
- Decision
The following are concerns relating to what has already been drafted:
- Issue 8: Lack of precision in the meaning of resource representations (XML and JSON).
- Issue 5: Content model, and to some extent, Issue 3
Topic revision: r2 - 24 Aug 2009 - 11:52:43 -
IanGreen