PlmSpecExtensions < Main

This wiki is locked. Future workgroup activity and specification development must take place at our new wiki. For more information, see this blog post about the new governance model and this post about changes to the website.
TWiki>
Main Web>PlmHome>PlmSpecExtensions (16 Apr 2012, GrayBachelor) (raw view)
-- Main.GrayBachelor - 05 Jan 2012

%TOC%

---++!! OSLC v1.1 Spec Extensions for PLM - Product Definition - aka "PD Spec V1.1"- Draft for discussion
 *Document Status:* Working draft, used for discussionand prototyping. Note that feedback applicable to the Core extensions for PLM and included in the new V1.1 are to be included here, during April 2012.

---++ Introduction

---+++ Need for a Product resource within the target scenario

The target PLM scenario [[PlmSystemsEngineeringScenarioSystemsEngineerReactstoChangedRequirements][A systems engineer responds to a change in requirements]] shows the need within both the PLM and ALM domains for stakeholders to identify a product and it's relevant requirements and implementation as means of securing their contribution. Within the scenario this is to identify the product which the change request is based upon, or "made from", and to identify the modified or new product, or product version, resulting from the change.

Product is a fundamental business entity within almost every commercial organisation, in some, System is also a primary concept, and may be logically equivalent to Product. Typically however System as a concept centres more on the capability and Product more on the commercial packaging or unit of delivery, System may exploit multiple Products as sub-system components and a Product may be a system, or contain multiple sub-systems. The focus here is on Product as a means of hosting a wide range of concerns.

Within the scenario stakeholders need to locate Change Requests, Requirements and Systems Implementation elements and artefacts from the Product perspective associate such elements and artefacts with the Product and its context. Product context being the relevant configuration, e.g. for the planned or actual phase of the lifecycle of concern or based upon criteria for effectivity or determinants for parameterised composition (i.e computed configuration).

The scenario begins with a product (or system) and associated requirenents and their associated, satisfying, implementations at some definied state; a change request is applied (i.e changes are made to relevant and impacted items) and their version identification are updated to signal completion of the change, with approvals. Version handling of the OSLC resource used in the scenario is needed, which is laid out in the [[CoreExtensionForPlm][Core extensions for PLM]], namely CM, AM and RM resources plus the new proposed PM resource that supports Products, Product Versions and Product Views.

<img width="781" alt="OSLC PLM main scenario overview" src="http://open-services.net/pub/Main/PlmWorkingMaterials/OSLC_versioning_cases_2.PNG" title="Fig 1: OSLC PLM main scenario overview" height="183" />

*Fig1:* Overview of the need for a Product resource to anchor the various concerns

An OSLC Product concept resource needs to support certain key common capabilities

1- Product identification to provide support for location and high-level or limited description of the product

name, description including alternative names* (i.e. psuedonyms)

product family coding and classification* including additional product type information

2- Variation handling to support changes to, or of, the product definition

Identification of versions and revisions, such as to denote that some change has been made

Composition by way of components, such as what a product consists of or is included in, from the various view points like Requirements, Documents, Models, Discipline views

Compositional configuration of viewpoints as versions or variants of a base product or system, such as a configured bill of materials or system breakdown

Effectivity handling, such as when particularly versions or variant become applicable, may be simply by date, manufacturing lot or tracked serial number

3 - Process support*

Event handling for subscriptions and notifications of changes to selectable (filtered) areas of interest baed upon process rules within the Product definition

Lifecyle process handling parameters used to provide business signals, such as availability, withdrawal, special handling needs

Ownership and approvals

(Items marked *Not currently addressed in the proposal)
---+++ Needed support for Product composition

Very typically Products are composed from or consist of collections, groupings or assemblies or other products and product components. The relationship can be formal such as a hierarchical decomposition with explicit functional information such as logical behaviour and interfaces or assembly information such as spatial position and orientation, or it can be looser based upon the mix of product sold or shipped together such as accessories. In these examples different compositional viewpoints are needed as the functional view is often composed different from the physical view, both in terms of included element types (e.g. OSLC reosurces) and the semantics of their relationships (e.g. product parts structure).

In general Product composition is a set of relationships between Product resources, as products or components if such a distinction is made, and between Product resources and other related resources, such as Requirements or AM Resources or SCM baselines. More specifically its the relationships between the prevailing, configured, versions of a Product or these other resources is the most interesting as it enables the detailed composition to be tuned or resolved more specifically as needed.

Product composition during the lifecycle can be under, over or precisely stated depending upon the need. Over stated to support future configuration or selection, under stated to allow build up and add-on kits. Even in operation additional options maybe be available from within the running product configuration "as installed". Therefore specification of composition, to configure, a Product is a key need. Furthermore dealing with the configuration specification as a resource in it own right is a likely future OSLC need, but not addressed yet here.

The approach here focuses on the resources and relationships for products, product versions, product views and their application to typical product structures. To inform this apporach we look to the existing industry standards for inspiration and examples

[[http://www.iso.org/iso/standards_development/technical_committees/list_of_iso_technical_committees/iso_technical_committee.htm?commid=54158][ISO10303]] STEP AP239 - for product definitions, change request definition, relationships between products and change requests, resource structures, versioning and relationships

[[http://www.iso.org/iso/standards_development/technical_committees/list_of_iso_technical_committees/iso_technical_committee.htm?commid=54158][ISO10303]] STEP AP233 - for requirements and system definitions and relationships, resource structures, versioning and relationships

[[http://www.omgsysml.org/][OMG SysML]] - for requirements and system definitions and relationships, resource structures, versioning and relationships

Note: Today these standards provide useful basis for specification of product, product version and product views but the subject of variant configuration is less well covered. Therefore the approach proposed is an initial way of using variant expressions.

The following diagrams outline the needed resource types and their relationships that support composition, applied here to a Product resource but applicable to other OSLC resources like AM Resources and Requirements especially.

<img width="252" alt="3 layer construct" src="http://open-services.net/pub/Main/PlmWorkingMaterials/item_3_layer_model_1.PNG" title="Product, Product version and Product View support" height="303" />

*Fig2:* Overview of the construct to support Product, Product Version and Product View

As can be seen from Fig 2 the construct is recursive to allow deep and tall relationships between products as components in other products and so treat products and their components consistently. This latter point beng of great value in making changes to products, in terms of organisational responsibility, such as make and buy decisions, or the ability to expose internal structure for collating quality or service information.

Using this construct it is then possible to assemble specific product compositional structures, for instance in the OSLC PLM Reference Modelshowing here a top level product, version and view with sample components, linked using the hasPart linktype.

<img width="701" alt="Application of the resource model" src="%PUBURL%/Main/PlmWorkingMaterials/Product_resource_model_application_1.PNG" height="395" />

*Fig3:* Sample application of the three level construct to support Product, Product Version and Product View within the HSUV model (OSLC PLM Reference Model)

---++++ Current approaches to defining products with OSLC 2.0 Specs

Clearly its possible to represent a Product or System using existing OSLC resources and properties. For instance at some stage of the lifecycle the Requirements may be the main representation or a product, in another sense the Implementation, repeesented by AM Resources, can represent the system model or an SCM Baseline resource could represent an ALM product release. Furthermore in some organisations the authorised Change Request to realise a new product is the reference for the product definition. It would be possible to adopt existing RDF/XML terms from existing product definition standards to build out such use of existing resource definitions.

Therefore the existing OSLC Specs have some potential to provide support for Product resources, however what this Product Management PM OSLC Spec aims to do is to provide a common and consistent resource definition for Product resource behaviour, clarifying certain resource capabilities. The aim is that such a PM Spec could be adopted by existing OSLC Spec service providers or consumers.
---+++ Summary of the Product resource concepts supported in the Product Definition (PD) Spec v1.1

Based upon the above needs the following concepts are included in this initial PD Spec v1.1 draft

1. Identification of a resource as a Product by way of a specific resource type, Product

2. Basic identification of a Product resource by recommended use of existing OSLC Core Spec properties

3. Adoption and application of versioning support as per the [[CoreExtensionForPlm][Core Extensions for PLM]]

4. Support for structural composition by way of Product views and related LinkTypes

5. Initial support for conditional variation support through Variant expressions
---++ Application of relationships with other OSLC Resources to fulfill the scenario

To meet the needs of the scenario the Product related resources need to support links with outher OSLC resources as outlined in Fig 1 above.

The specific relationships recommended and needed are

---++ PM Resource Definition

Property value types that are not defined in the following sections, are defined in [[OslcCoreSpecification#Defining_OSLC_Properties][OSLC Core - Defining OSLC Properties]]
---+++ Resource Product

The Product resource is used to define products.

The Product resource properties are not limited to the ones defined in this specification, service providers may provide additional properties. It is recommended that any additional properties exist in their own unique namespace and not use the namespaces defined in these specifications.

*Name:* _Product_
   * *Type URI* http://open-services.net/ns/oslcdomainname#Product

<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" id="table2" border="1"><thead><tr style="background-color: #a9a9a9"><th valign="top">%WHITE%Prefixed Name%ENDCOLOR% </th> <th valign="top"> %WHITE%Occurs%ENDCOLOR% </th> <th valign="top"> %WHITE%Read-only%ENDCOLOR% </th> <th valign="top"> %WHITE%Value-type%ENDCOLOR% </th> <th valign="top"> %WHITE%Represen-tation%ENDCOLOR% </th> <th valign="top"> %WHITE%Range%ENDCOLOR% </th> <th colspan="2" valign="top"> %WHITE%Description%ENDCOLOR% </th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td colspan="8" align="center" bgcolor="#ffffff" valign="top"> *OSLC Core:* Common Properties </td> </tr> <tr style="background-color: #ccffff"> <td bgcolor="#ffffff" valign="top"> </td> <td bgcolor="#ffffff" valign="top"> </td> <td bgcolor="#ffffff" valign="top"> </td> <td bgcolor="#ffffff" valign="top"> </td> <td bgcolor="#ffffff" valign="top"> </td> <td bgcolor="#ffffff" valign="top"> </td> <td colspan="2" bgcolor="#ffffff" valign="top"> </td></tr><tr><td>dcterms: shortTitle </td><td> zero-or-one</td><td>unspecified </td><td>XMLLiteral </td><td>n/a </td><td>n/a </td><td colspan="2">

Short name identifying a resource, often used as an abbreviated identifier for presentation to end-users. SHOULD include only content that is valid inside an XHTML &lt;span&gt; element.

OSLC PM Spec recommended use as Product number., Product version name or product view name.
</td></tr><tr><td>dcterms: Title</td><td>exactly-one</td><td>unspecified </td><td>XMLLiteral </td><td>n/a </td><td>n/a </td><td colspan="2">

Title (reference: Dublin Core) or often a single line summary of the resource represented as rich text in XHTML content. SHOULD include only content that is valid and suitable inside an XHTML &lt;div&gt; element.

OSLC PM Spec recommended use as Product name
</td></tr><tr><td>dcterms: Description<br /></td><td>zero-or-one</td><td>unspecified </td><td>XMLLiteral </td><td>n/a </td><td>n/a</td><td colspan="2">

Descriptive text (reference: Dublin Core) about resource represented as rich text in XHTML content. SHOULD include only content that is valid and suitable inside an XHTML &lt;div&gt; element.

OSLC PM Spec recommended use as Product Description
</td></tr><tr><td>dcterms:identifier </td><td>exactly-one </td><td> True</td><td>String</td><td>n/a </td><td>n/a </td><td colspan="2">A unique identifier for a resource. Assigned by the service provider when a resource is created. Not intended for end-user display. </td></tr><tr><td>dcterms:isVersionOf</td><td>zero-or-one</td><td>yes<br /></td><td>Either Resource or local resource </td><td>Either Reference or Inline</td><td> resource of same type</td><td colspan="2"> A related resource of which the described resource is a version, edition, or adaptation. OSLC usage requires the target resource *MUST* be a resource of the same type as the owning resource. </td></tr><tr><td>dcterms:replaces</td><td>zero-or-many<br /></td><td> unspecified</td><td> Either Resource or local resource </td><td> Either Reference or Inline</td><td> resource of the same type</td><td colspan="2"> A related resource that is supplanted, displaced, or superseded by the described resource. OSLC usage requires the target resource *MUST* be a resource of the same type as the owning resource. </td></tr> <tr><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td colspan="2"> </td></tr><tr> <td colspan="8" align="center" bgcolor="#ffffff" valign="top"> *OSLC PM Spec:* Common Properties </td> </tr><tr style="background-color: #ccffff"> <td bgcolor="#ffffff" valign="top"> rdf:type </td> <td bgcolor="#ffffff" valign="top">one -or-many </td> <td bgcolor="#ffffff" valign="top"> unspecified </td> <td bgcolor="#ffffff" valign="top">Resource </td> <td bgcolor="#ffffff" valign="top"> Reference </td> <td bgcolor="#ffffff" valign="top">n/a </td> <td colspan="2" bgcolor="#ffffff" valign="top">The resource type URIs. One of at least has the value of http://open-services.net/ns/oslcdomainname# Product. <br /></td></tr><tr><td>rdf:type </td><td>one -or-many </td><td>unspecified </td><td>Resource </td><td>Reference </td><td>n/a </td><td colspan="2">The resource type URIs. One of at least has the value of http://open-services.net/ns/oslcdomainname# ProductVersion </td></tr><tr><td>rdf:type </td><td>one -or-many </td><td> unspecified </td><td>Resource </td><td>Reference </td><td>n/a </td><td colspan="2"> The resource type URIs. One of at least has the value of http://open-services.net/ns/oslcdomainname# ProductView </td></tr><tr><td>oslc_pm:hasView</td><td>zero-or-many</td><td>unspecified </td><td>Resource </td><td>Reference </td><td>any<br /></td><td colspan="2">A related resource which is a view of the Product, of type ProductView </td></tr><tr><td>oslc_pm:hasPart</td><td>zero-or-many</td><td>unspecified </td><td>Resource </td><td>Reference </td><td>any </td><td colspan="2">A related resource which is a compositional element, component part, of the Product. Examples are ProductVersion, ProductView or AM Resource Version or AM Resource View </td></tr></tbody></table>

---++ Creation of a Product Resource

Creation of a Product Resource

---++ Appendix A - Sample OSLC Product, Product Version and Product View Resources

Sample resource definitions are included here from the OSLC PLM Reference Model

| Resource type | OSLC Ref model example | Scenario version | Usage example | Relationships | Example |
| PM | AMG54556 HSUV Product | Base | <!--[if !mso]> <style> v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} p\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} v\:textbox {display:none;} </style> <![endif]--><!--[if !ppt]--><!--[endif]--> <p> </p><p>Base PM Product Resource </p> <p> </p> | <!--[if !mso]> <style> v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} p\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} v\:textbox {display:none;} </style> <![endif]--><!--[if !ppt]--><!--[endif]--> <p> </p><p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> | <a href="http://open-services.net/pub/Main/PlmSpecExtensions/Product_AMG54556_example.xml" title="Product Resource example">HSUV Product example from the OSLC PLM Reference Model</a> |
| PM | <!--[if !mso]> <style> v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} p\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} v\:textbox {display:none;} </style> <![endif]--><!--[if !ppt]--><!--[endif]--> <p> </p><p>AMG54556 HSUV Product Version</p> <p> </p> | Version | <!--[if !mso]> <style> v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} p\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} v\:textbox {display:none;} </style> <![endif]--><!--[if !ppt]--><!--[endif]--> <p> </p><p>PM Product Version Resource </p> <p> </p> | <!--[if !mso]> <style> v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} p\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} v\:textbox {display:none;} </style> <![endif]--><!--[if !ppt]--><!--[endif]--> <p> </p><p>isVersionOf </p> <p> </p> | <a href="http://open-services.net/pub/Main/PlmSpecExtensions/ProductVersion_AMG54556_001_example.xml" title="Product Version example">HSUV Product Version example from the OSLC PLM Reference Model</a> |
| PM | AMG54556 HSUV Product View | View | PM Product View Resource | <p>hasView</p><p>hasPart </p> | [[%ATTACHURL%/ProductView_AMG54556_001_example.xml][HSUV Product View example from the OSLC PLM Reference Model]] |
Attachments
Topic attachments
I	Attachment	Action	Size	Date	Who	Comment
xml	ProductVersion_AMG54556_001_example.xml	manage	1.8 K	06 Jan 2012 - 12:29	GrayBachelor	OSLC PLM Reference Model Product Version RDF example
xml	ProductView_AMG54556_001_example.xml	manage	1.7 K	06 Jan 2012 - 12:52	GrayBachelor	OSLC PLM Reference Model Product View RDF example
xml	Product_AMG54556_example.xml	manage	1.5 K	06 Jan 2012 - 12:29	GrayBachelor	OSLC PLM Reference Model Product RDF example
Topic revision: r8 - 16 Apr 2012 - 16:15:18 - GrayBachelor
Main
Webs
Main
Sandbox
TWiki
Copyright � by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Contributions are governed by our Terms of Use
Ideas, requests, problems regarding this site? Send feedback