This wiki is locked. Future workgroup activity and specification development must take place at our new wiki. For more information, see this blog post about the new governance model and this post about changes to the website.

OSLC Core Meeting August 11, 2010

Meeting logistics

See the OslcCoreMeetings for more information, more dial-in numbers and on-line meeting information.

  • Conference Access
    • Toll free: 1-866-423-8350
    • Toll: 1-719-387-8273
  • Participant passcode: 558663

Agenda

  • Actions taken:
    • AI: Dave to investigate size hint changes from UI preview, make sure it gets into Core, may already be there* - DONE and in Core
    • AI: Dave talk to Arthur and get that the RDF/XML query examples right - DONE and let's review
    • AI: Dave to change to dc:creator and dc:contributor to resource value-type "Either" - DONE and in Appendix A
    • AI: Dave to change to dc:creator and dc:contributor so they SHOULD be foaf:Person - DONE and in Appendix A
    • AI: Dave to investigate adding rdfs:label to common properties
      • Not certain that this is equivalent to oslc:name or oslc:label
      • Range of rdfs:label is literal
      • Domain is rdfs:Resource, which indicates it only makes sense in an RDFS schema?
      • http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_label
  • Pending actions:
    • AI: Dave to provide example of paged resource
  • Any status or community news to share?

Minutes

Attendees and notes from the meeting

Attendees

Topics discussed

  • Discussed RDF/XML query examples and three ways to get queries
    • Dave: are these examples and guidances correct?
    • Dave: do we need use cases to explain when to use each
    • Jim: don't need use cases, these examples are useful enough
    • Scott: use cases may not be a good idea, but a discussion of the motivation for each approach would be good
    • Scott: for technique #2 you are not adding an oslc:resourceType you are adding rdf:type to the query
    • Dave: oslc:resourceType is what you would use to specify that type in a resource shape
    • Scott: this probably needs more review
    • AI - Dave: yes, I will ask Arthur for a detailed review and mark the spec to indicate that it is under review

  • Discussed idea of adding rdfs:label to common properties
    • Scott: we replaced dcterms:name, which does not exist, with oslc:shortTitle - no need for rdfs:label there
    • Scott: we use oslc:label in the Service Provider
    • Dave: rdfs:label is supposed to be an XMLLiteral, so it is not a good replacement for oslc:label
    • Dave: no reason to add this to common properties, at least not yet

  • Discussed what to cover in next workgroup meetings
    • Dave: not ready to discuss Links today
    • Scott: can we queue up the discussion for next week, we need to get moving on Links
    • Jim: I'd like to participate but I will be at Innovate 2010 India next week
    • Jim and Ian had short discussion of polymorphic resources, not necessarily related to representations

  • Wrapped up meeting
    • Next week: another short review meeting
    • Week after: discuss links and how to finalize
Topic revision: r5 - 22 Oct 2010 - 18:32:05 - DaveJohnson
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Copyright � by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Contributions are governed by our Terms of Use
Ideas, requests, problems regarding this site? Send feedback