This wiki is locked. Future workgroup activity and specification development must take place at our new wiki. For more information, see this blog post about the new governance model and this post about changes to the website.

OSLC Core Meeting April 28, 2010

Meeting logistics

See the OslcCoreMeetings for telecon number, passcode and online meeting info.

Agenda

What I would like to cover today is status, discussion of the two open issues and a proposal for two more long review sessions.

Status - Item #1 - We've whittled down the list of open issues to just this short list:

  • Question: Do we really need both OSLC Core and OSLC Domain version strings?
  • Question: Do we really need two query response formats?
  • Task: Ensure that we are including the right common properties
  • Task: Add common property oslc:instanceShape (Resource, zero-or-many)
  • Task: complete Atom representation examples
  • Task: complete Query examples (assuming we need two formats)

Status - Item #2 - We almost finished a review of the UI Preview spec. Where are we on this now?

Discussion: consider those two questions above, can we close either issue today?

Next Steps - Item #1 - Plan is to review Guidance on Partial Update next week. First draft will be ready Friday.

Next Steps - Item #2 - It's time to review the RESOLVED items so that we can mark them CLOSED. I believe that we'll need two more sessions and I would like to proposed these possible times:

  • 9:30AM ET to 11:30AM Thursday Apr 29
  • 9:30AM ET to 11:30AM Friday Apr 30
  • 9:30AM ET to 11:30AM Monday May 3
  • 9:30AM ET to 11:30AM Tuesday May 4

Meeting Minutes

Possible Attendees

Discussed need for both OSLC Core and OSLC Domain version string

Nick C - OSLC Core version string is needed for writing a truly generic client

Scott B - need to establish use cases before allowing two version strings, need to thoroughly understand this issue

Scott B - need versioning story for versioned services not just versioned

Dave J - need to reconcile the various places that we use version strings

  • one version string or two
  • need for version number in namespace
  • need for version string for each resource

Dave J - we will work on use cases and have a meeting to review and resolve this issue

Discussed need for both single-subject and multi-subject query

Arthur R - we can live without mutli-subject query

Dave J - I don't full understand the implications of this, we should talk offline

Topic revision: r2 - 28 Apr 2010 - 15:20:56 - DaveJohnson
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Copyright � by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Contributions are governed by our Terms of Use
Ideas, requests, problems regarding this site? Send feedback