This wiki is locked. Future workgroup activity and specification development must take place at our new wiki. For more information, see this blog post about the new governance model and this post about changes to the website.

OSLC Core Meeting August 24, 2011

Previous meeting

Link to OSLC Core spec: OslcCoreSpecification

Meeting logistics

How to dial-in to our telecon and login to our screen-sharing session.

Telecon Info

USA Toll-Free: 888-426-6840 USA Caller Paid: 215-861-6239 Participant Code: 3292849

Other numbers: https://www.teleconference.att.com/servlet/glbAccess?process=1&accessCode=3292849&accessNumber=2158616239

Online meeting

(when we need it)

For IBM employees, use the following link: http://w3.ibm.com/collaboration/meeting/join/?schedid=4440645 (IBM intranet authentication required)

For people outside IBM, use the following link: http://www.ibm.com/collaboration/meeting/join?id=4440645

Agenda

  • Workgroup news
  • Meeting time & frequency: proposed alt time?
  • 2.0 Issues
  • 3.0 content and priorities discussion
    • We'll talk about various priorities for Core 3.0 and OSLC in general. This will mostly be a discussion to review feedback given so far and gather information on priorities.
    • Proposed themes:
      • Adoption - evaluate what tasks can be done to help with general adoption of specs - tutorials, SDKs, supporting docs to spec, validating the level of OSLC support through a scale
      • Simplification - along the same theme of adoption, look for ways to continue to simplify both the number of concepts, model and overall complexity of OSLC, reducing the technical barriers to adoption. This includes alignment with other standards bodies like W3C? around linked data patterns.
      • Community Growth - ways to broaden the community and solidify OSLC as an independent entity opening the door for larger community
      • DevOps - expanding the reach of ALM into operations which also has some implications of OSLC support strictly within Ops
      • PLM - exposes specification and guidance on spec usage for PLM
      • ALM continued - looking at additional scenarios needed.  Think of it as a continued evolution of what we have today.
    • OslcCoreV3Plan
  • Upcoming meetings:
    • Sept 7 - (tentative) continued 3.0 content progress
    • Sept 21 - (tentative) continued 3.0 content progress

Minutes

Workgroup news

  • AM 2.0 final
  • Eclipse Lyo project moving forward
  • Automation WG looking to revive in coming months.
  • Communications WG to kick off

Meeting time & frequency: proposed alt time?

  • Wed @ 2, prob with this in UK ACTION: Steve to send out survey for better time

2.0 Issues

3.0 content and priorities discussion

  • We'll talk about various priorities for Core 3.0 and OSLC in general. This will mostly be a discussion to review feedback given so far and gather information on priorities.
  • Proposed themes:
    • Adoption - evaluate what tasks can be done to help with general adoption of specs - tutorials, SDKs, supporting docs to spec, validating the level of OSLC support through a scale
    • Simplification - along the same theme of adoption, look for ways to continue to simplify both the number of concepts, model and overall complexity of OSLC, reducing the technical barriers to adoption. This includes alignment with other standards bodies like W3C? around linked data patterns.
    • Community Growth - ways to broaden the community and solidify OSLC as an independent entity opening the door for larger community
    • DevOps - expanding the reach of ALM into operations which also has some implications of OSLC support strictly within Ops
    • PLM - exposes specification and guidance on spec usage for PLM
    • ALM continued - looking at additional scenarios needed. Think of it as a continued evolution of what we have today.
    • Arthur: would be very valuable to have overall conceptual model of all domains and their model. Nick: this will get worse over time.
  • OslcCoreV3Plan
    • Time table of 2Q2012 for Core 3.0 seen as too soon. Look to complete towards end of 2012. Need to get feedback from key stakeholders on priorities and time tables.
  • JohnArwe: question of domain URI to use for SPC when not a standard domain yet: queued up for upcoming meeting

Upcoming meetings:

  • Sept 7 - (tentative) continued 3.0 content progress
  • Sept 21 - (tentative) continued 3.0 content progress

Attendees

SteveSpeicher (chair)

NickCrossley ArthurRyman JimConallen SheehanAnderson MichaelFiedler BenjaminWilliams CharlesRankin PaulMcMahan JohnArwe

Topics discussed

Topic revision: r6 - 19 Oct 2011 - 16:27:50 - SteveSpeicher
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Copyright � by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Contributions are governed by our Terms of Use
Ideas, requests, problems regarding this site? Send feedback