This wiki is locked. Future workgroup activity and specification development must take place at our new wiki. For more information, see this blog post about the new governance model and this post about changes to the website.

Estimation and Measurement Telecon, 2010-04-09

See Weekly Meeting Logistics for telecon information.

Previous telecon 2010-04-02

Next telecon 2010-04-16

Attendees

AndrewCanham, AndyBerner, ArthurRyman, LawrenceMandel, LeeFischman

Minutes

1. Implementation Status - All

LawrenceMandel has picked up the prototype previously development by Rational and will continue its development.

2. Review of REST API Data Models - ArthurRyman

We reviewed the following data models:

The Service Root

No issues raised.

Domain Entity Lists

No issues raised.

Domain Entity ems:Project

Baselining Across Subprojects

AndrewCanham: If a project has subprojects, how do you handled baselining across all the subprojects?

ArthurRyman: The EMS 1.0 spec does not provide a way to represent the project-subproject structure. It's limited to describing estimates and measurements for "atomic" projects, i.e. with opaque structure. The project-subproject structure would have to be handled by another tool, e.g. a project management tool, that was a consumer of the EMS 1.0 service. The consumer tool would use the EMS 1.0 REST API to individually baseline each of the subprojects in the master project.

Meaning of ems:isClosed

ArthurRyman: This is not a lifecycle state since that information should be represented in measurements of the project. It is an indicator that the project has been closed from a data update viewpoint, and that calibration tools can use the project as a stable source of historical data.

Domain Entity ems:Scenario

Write-Once Properties

AndyBerner: The ems:project property is conceptually write-once. However, the spec says it's read-write in order to allow for error correction. There should be separate admin mechanisms for correctly errors. I think making it write-once would be appealing.

ArthurRyman: I agree, and this particular case was one of the motivations for defining write-once properties. However, people may want to correct errors without needing admin assistance. If this property was write-once, a user would have to delete the scenario and recreate it with the correct project reference. I'd like to poll the others about how they feel about making this property write-once.

ArthurRyman: Since there is no strong preference to change this, let's revisit this after we complete the first pass of reviewing all the data models

Can Scenarios Span Projects?

LawrenceMandel: Can a scenario involve more than one project, e.g. doing a resource tradeoff between several projects?

ArthurRyman: No, a scenario represents an alternate way to run a single project. In your example, a portfolio management tools would have to create the alternate resource allocation scenarios for each project and manage their relations.

Comments

Add your comments here:

 
Edit | Attach | Print version | History: r4 < r3 < r2 < r1 | Backlinks | Raw View | Raw edit | More topic actions...
Topic revision: r3 - 09 Apr 2010 - 16:01:21 - ArthurRyman
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Copyright � by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Contributions are governed by our Terms of Use
Ideas, requests, problems regarding this site? Send feedback