This wiki is locked. Future workgroup activity and specification development must take place at our new wiki. For more information, see this blog post about the new governance model and this post about changes to the website.
Date: Wednesday, 13 Oct 2010
Time: 12:00 PM Eastern, 9:00 AM Pacific, 6:00 PM Zurich (contact SteveSpeicher if you'd like to participate)Agenda:
- Progress on 2.0 spec finalization
- Promoting usage URIs to be allowed values for rdf:type of a oslc_cm:ChangeRequest
- Clarifying what should be returned from queries when requesting application/xml: atom or rdf-subset?
- Review any new CmImplementationReports
- Review and resolve any CmSpecV2Issues on CmSpecificationV2
- Will declare 2.0 final when:
- 2 Provider implementation reports received (4 received as of 13-Sept)
- 1 Consumer implementation report received (4 received as of 13-Sept)
- Looking for more feedback on shapes, limited feedback to date
- WG will review impl reports and make decision on whether specs are considered implementable and interoperable
- Continue to leave open for feedback
- Community updates
- Implementation progress
- Review and prioritize scenarios for further consideration
- Next meetings:
- 27-Oct-2010 Scoping of scenarios and content for post-2.0 specs.
Minutes:
Attendees: SteveSpeicher, RobertElves, AndreWeinand, SamPadgett, SofiaYeung, DaveJohnson -- ScottBosworth Regrets: MikKersten, SamitMehta,- Call for additional agenda items, none.
- Progress on 2.0 spec finalization
- Promoting usage URIs to be allowed values for rdf:type of a oslc_cm:ChangeRequest
- agreement to make change
- Clarifying what should be returned from queries when requesting application/xml: atom or rdf-subset?
- will clarify what appl/xml
- will clarify to use rdf/xml within atom+xml
- Review any new CmImplementationReports
- Review and resolve any CmSpecV2Issues on CmSpecificationV2
- Promoting usage URIs to be allowed values for rdf:type of a oslc_cm:ChangeRequest
- Will declare 2.0 final when:
- 2 Provider implementation reports received (4 received as of 13-Sept)
- 1 Consumer implementation report received (4 received as of 13-Sept)
- Looking for more feedback on shapes, limited feedback to date
- WG will review impl reports and make decision on whether specs are considered implementable and interoperable
- Continue to leave open for feedback
- Community updates
- Implementation progress
- Review and prioritize scenarios for further consideration
- Next meetings:
- 27-Oct-2010 Scoping of scenarios and content for post-2.0 specs.
Topic revision: r5 - 13 Oct 2010 - 16:16:43 - SteveSpeicher
Main Web
Create New Topic
Index
Search
Changes
Notifications
RSS Feed
Statistics
Preferences
Main|
|
Copyright � by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors. Contributions are governed by our Terms of Use
Ideas, requests, problems regarding this site? Send feedback