This wiki is locked. Future workgroup activity and specification development must take place at
our new wiki
. For more information, see
this blog post about the new governance model
and
this post about changes to the website
.
TWiki
>
Main Web
>
AmHome
>
ArchMgmtMeetings
>
ArchMgmtMeetings10Dec2009
(10 Dec 2009,
JimConallen
)
(raw view)
Date: *10 December 2009* <br />Time: *7:00 AM Pacific, 10:00 AM Eastern, 3:00 PM UK, 4:00 PM Frankfurt, 5:00 PM Haifa* <br />Call In Number: (emailed)<br />Participation request: contact JimConallen ---++ Agenda 1 Quickly summarize points from last meeting. 1 Jim C. will present some changes, inspired by RM workgroup to resource format 1 Discuss query ---++ Minutes Atendees: Alan Yeung, Brenda Ellis, Ian Green, Scott Bosworth, Tom Picolli, Jim Conallen 1 Unfortunately the conference call system was down, and Scott B. allowed us to use his number (which uses a different system). So attendance was down. Still, the team did discuss the recent updates in the AM spec. 1 Jim C. explained these changes reflected the current thinking from the OSLC leads regarding links, and how they are presented to the client. The changes in the AM spec also parallel those recently made in the RM specification. 1 The team discussed the ability to address additional properties in an AM resource. Once concern that popped up is with resource URIs that already have a fragment or query part in them. URIs like this make it difficult to directly address a property in a resource. 1 The other issue and topic of conversation that popped up was how to execute queries that find things like all resources with a link to a specified URI. The current OSLC query spec does not cover this. This is a critical requirement in the AM spec. 1 We concluded the meeting with a brief discussion of the spec time frame, and whether it is worth while to put off any specification of links until a 2.0 spec. It was pointed out by the implementation vendors, that in order to meet a 2010Q3 deliverable, a real spec needs to agreed on in Jan 2010. If one is not, then the implementations will do their own thing to acheive the goal. 1 The next meeting we will continue discussions on what is realistic for a spec that needs to be finalized at the end of Jan 2010.
E
dit
|
A
ttach
|
P
rint version
|
H
istory
: r2
<
r1
|
B
acklinks
|
V
iew topic
|
Ra
w
edit
|
M
ore topic actions
Topic revision: r2 - 10 Dec 2009 - 16:21:55 -
JimConallen
Main
Main Web
Create New Topic
Index
Search
Changes
Notifications
RSS Feed
Statistics
Preferences
Webs
Main
Sandbox
TWiki
Български
Cesky
Dansk
Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
日本語
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Svenska
简体中文
簡體中文
Copyright � by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Contributions are governed by our
Terms of Use
Ideas, requests, problems regarding this site?
Send feedback