This wiki is locked. Future workgroup activity and specification development must take place at
our new wiki
. For more information, see
this blog post about the new governance model
and
this post about changes to the website
.
TWiki
>
Main Web
>
RmHome
>
RmMeetings
>
RmMeetings20100614
(16 Jun 2010,
IanGreen
)
(raw view)
Agenda Updates on Action Items * Extent to which adoption of OSLC Core with impact RM scenarios (Simon & Jeremy) * Feedback on link standardization page (Brenda) Scenario work * Discuss data dictionary scenarios. Nicolas Dangeville has created some scenarios around data dictionaries and would like to bring them to OSLC RM for potential inclusion in our work. The scenarios can be found here: RmScenarioDataDictionary. Specification work * OSLC Core adoption (Ian) ---+++ Minutes Attendees: IanGreen, PaulMcMahan, SimonWills, BrendaEllis, ScottBosworth, NicolasDangeville, DominicTulley, NickKruk SimonWills: looked at the core spec, and guidance documents, guidance and query. Mapped that to the richer scenarios, to see what would<br />work and what would not. 1 Links document - rather confusing. Critical to get this right (Brenda agreed). Ian commented that this is draft state, and that Simon and Brenda's comments should be taken to the core working group. Scott took action to try to get links on the agenda for a core meeting. Scott emphasised that there is no expectation that a domain would be adopt a single linking pattern across all resources. 1 Core Query. Looked like it meets the needs of RM, with the known exception that it does not support query for resources that do not have links. Simon also expressed concern that a missing piece in the RM resource model is heirarchy (structured organization of requirements) and that query would, in time, need to deal with this structure. Ian took an action item to get "requirements organization" on our roadmap for post 2.0. BrendEllis action item on feedback on the OSLC Link Standardization continutes. IanGreen reported no progress on the draft V2.0 specification due to other committments. This effort continues. NicolasDangeville presented the material on RmScenarioDataDictionaries. The presentation give a high-level motivation for the role of data dictionaries. Scott raised the concern that, in the spirit of OSLC, we would like to see a greater interest from the community in assessing the value of these scenarios. Nicholas took an action to develop this motivation further. Another concern (from Ian) was that whilst data dictionaries may appear close to RM initially, there is a risk that more sophisticated scenarios (either DD or RM, or both) would put pressure on the specification to contain both of them. Keeping the specifications distinct would alieviate this risk.
E
dit
|
A
ttach
|
P
rint version
|
H
istory
: r3
<
r2
<
r1
|
B
acklinks
|
V
iew topic
|
Ra
w
edit
|
M
ore topic actions
Topic revision: r3 - 16 Jun 2010 - 09:48:43 -
IanGreen
Main.RmMeetings20100614 moved from Main.RmMeetings20100615 on 14 Jun 2010 - 14:51 by
IanGreen
-
put it back
Main
Main Web
Create New Topic
Index
Search
Changes
Notifications
RSS Feed
Statistics
Preferences
Webs
Main
Sandbox
TWiki
Български
Cesky
Dansk
Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
日本語
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Svenska
简体中文
簡體中文
Copyright � by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Contributions are governed by our
Terms of Use
Ideas, requests, problems regarding this site?
Send feedback