This wiki is locked. Future workgroup activity and specification development must take place at our new wiki. For more information, see this blog post about the new governance model and this post about changes to the website.
Meeting 13 August 2009


  • Introductions
  • Forwarding the call for participation
  • Cross participation in other workgroups
  • Web site
  • 2009 Goals
    • Basic integrations with RM
    • QM Service Description
    • QM Restful Services
    • QM Resource XML Definition
  • Proposed timeline for v1.0
    • 9/1 Scenarios
    • 10/1 Draft specification
    • 11/1 Final specification
  • Meeting logistics
    • Frequency (bi-weekly)
    • Web conference
    • Teleconference


Attendance: MikeSaylor, SteveAbrams, ScottBosworth, JimConallen, IanGreen, ScottFairbrother, BillTobin? , PaulTasillo? , PaulMcMahan

  • Background on rest api and integrations in QM space
  • Current industry participation in OSLC QM workgroup
    • IBM
    • Big Lever
    • Sogeti
  • Workgroup desires further industry participation
    • Several other propects discussed
    • Need to follow up on a couple of leads and suggestions
    • Workgroup communication should facilitate openness
    • May request a separate OSLC email list for QM
  • Healthy "cross pollination" with other OSLC workgroups
  • Discussed goals and timeline for 2009
    • Proposed timeline for v1.0 specs is aggressive
    • Mitigated by scoping scenarios
    • Assumption is that the work done on CM specifications can be leveraged
    • Risk associated with above assumption is that the QM scenarios may end up being dissimilar to CM scenarios
    • Another risk is that parts of the CM specs may need to be revisited
  • Scenarios
    • Currently in draft form
    • They are requirement-centric, not necessarily a problem
    • Probably similar to RM scenarios
    • QM workgroup needs to review and provide feedback
  • For next meeting (in two weeks)
    • Report back on any contacts made inviting further industry participation
    • Provide feedback on the draft QM scenarios
    • Everyone to consider in what role and capacity they wish to contribute to the group
  • Meeting logisitics
    • Need to schedule early in the AM to allow participation from Europe and Asia
    • mtg time should favor the widest industry participation over highest attendance

-- PaulMcMahan - 10 Aug 2009

Topic revision: r4 - 29 Mar 2010 - 21:21:04 - PaulMcMahan
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Copyright � by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Contributions are governed by our Terms of Use
Ideas, requests, problems regarding this site? Send feedback