This wiki is locked. Future workgroup activity and specification development must take place at
our new wiki
. For more information, see
this blog post about the new governance model
and
this post about changes to the website
.
TWiki
>
Main Web
>
CmHome
>
CmMeetings
>
CmMeetings09162009
(23 Sep 2009,
AndreWeinand
)
(raw view)
---++ Date: Wednesday, 16 September 2009 Time: 12:00 PM Eastern, 9:00 AM Pacific, 6:00 PM Zurich<br />(contact SteveSpeicher if you'd like to participate) ---+++ Agenda: * Call for last minute agenda changes * Reminder to register for CM-specific mailing list at [[http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-cm_open-services.net][http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-cm_open-services.net ]] * Update on outstanding Actions see CmMeetings09022009 * Review ScenariosMylyn and usage with standard ITask interface * Elaborate on scenarios that can be solved with common vocabularies: CmScenariosReporting and ScenariosMylyn * Progress on schema variants. * Progress on 2.0 specs * Prioritize scenarios * Define scope - CmArchitecturalDirectionV2 * Milestone plans * Progress on extending participation - both as WG participants and implementations * 1.0 spec maintenance items * Feedback from implementations CmImplementationReports * CmSpecificationIssueTracking ---+++ Minutes Attendees: SteveSpeicher, AndreWeinand, RobertElves, MikKersten, ScottBosworth, SamLee, MarkRinger, SamitMehta, SteveAbrams, SofiaYeung, DenisTyrell Regrets: EricSink * Call for agenda updates * MikKersten requests add of Mylyn implementation of CM spec * Mylyn implementation of CM spec being added to October plan with some core Java API support (OSLC-CM 1.0), filling in gaps for February 2010 with possible 2.0 content as well. * Would like to explore the utilityof this in later releases * Looking to support delegated Web UI for submissions from Eclipse UI * Quick introductions, welcoming SofiaYeung and DenisTyrell from Oracle * RobertElves reviewed ScenariosMylyn ITask interface: * ACTION: RobertElves to update * There are relationships involved that aren't highlighted here * ACTION: SteveSpeicher and all to build a table/matrix comparing each tools representation of a ChangeRequest as well as what type of scenarios they are needed for. Target for contribution by September 28 so it can be combined and review for CmMeetings09302009 * CmChangeRequestMatrix * Discussion around integration approaches: UI, fixed vocabularies and meta-data. Consensus in that each scenario may require a different or combined or new approach to integration * ACTION: SteveAbrams, ScottBosworth and MarkRinger to draft up details on integration styles * Next Meeting 30-Sept-2009 12:00 PM Eastern * Review mapping of fields from various resource types (task, defect, enhancement) by each WG member's tool/perspective * Update on integration styles writeup _Please update with corrections as needed_
E
dit
|
A
ttach
|
P
rint version
|
H
istory
: r4
<
r3
<
r2
<
r1
|
B
acklinks
|
V
iew topic
|
Ra
w
edit
|
M
ore topic actions
Topic revision: r4 - 23 Sep 2009 - 10:51:57 -
AndreWeinand
Main
Main Web
Create New Topic
Index
Search
Changes
Notifications
RSS Feed
Statistics
Preferences
Webs
Main
Sandbox
TWiki
Български
Cesky
Dansk
Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
日本語
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Svenska
简体中文
簡體中文
Copyright � by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Contributions are governed by our
Terms of Use
Ideas, requests, problems regarding this site?
Send feedback