OSLC Automation Spec V1 Issues

This section captures the issues raised via review comments on:

• AutoSpecificationV1 - the OSLC-Automation V1.0 Specification

Issues are organized via the specification outline.

Note: dates below use US format (mm/dd/yyyy)

Here's what the states mean:

• OPEN - indicates that we have no response for the issue yet
• RESOLVED - indicates that we have a response that we believe resolves the issue
  • RESOLVED - indicates it is resolved as by above definition and edits in the draft specification have been made.
• CLOSED - issue has been resolved and the resolution has been reviewed by the workgroup
• DEFERRED - indicates that issue will be addressed in guidance after the specification converges
• TABLED - indicates that issue will be reconsidered at some later but unspecified date

Issues during draft development

1. OPEN - Should both RDF/XML and XML representations be supported? XML mainly for OSLC V1 backward support. Should not be needed for Automation unless scenarios require it.
2. OPEN - Similarly, should both XML and Atom Syndication representations be required for Query?