The Automation workgroup wanted to see what the minimum definition of a simple name/value pair would look like under this approach.

The following test plan contains a parameter definition for a required string parameter named "StringParam1" using the minimum required attributes.

http://open-services.net/ns/auto#ParameterDefinition would have to be defined in the OSLC vocabulary.

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:oslc="http://open-services.net/ns/core#"
   xmlns:oslc_auto="http://open-services.net/ns/auto#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
   <oslc_auto:AutomationPlan rdf:about="http://example.org/autoPlans/plan1">
      <dcterms:title>Automation Plan 1</dcterms:title>
      <dcterms:identifier>1</dcterms:identifier>
      <oslc_auto:parameter>
         <rdf:Description>
            <oslc:name>StringParm1</oslc:name>
            <oslc:occurs>http://open-services.net/ns/core#Exactly-one</oslc:occurs>
            <oslc:propertyDefinition rdf:resource="http://open-services.net/ns/auto#ParameterDefinition" />
            <oslc:valueType>http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string</oslc:valueType>
         </rdf:Description>
      </oslc_auto:parameter>
   </oslc_auto:AutomationPlan>
</rdf:RDF>