This wiki is locked. Future workgroup activity and specification development must take place at our new wiki. For more information, see this blog post about the new governance model and this post about changes to the website.

OSLC Asset Management Implementation Reports

Implementers of the OSLC Asset Management specifications are encouraged to place feedback on their experience (good and bad). To add a report, simply copy and paste a section template and fill out any necessary information.

OSLC Asset Management 2.0

This section gathers implementation reports for OSLC Asset Management 2.0

Providers

<2.0 template>

<Implementer> (copy and update template)

Contact information:

  • Reported by...
  • This capability was implemented in...
  • Date of report:
  • Date of availability: (indicate if estimated)

Details about support:

  • Specification version supported: OSLC Asset Management 2.0
  • Implementation supported: <consumer> and/or <service provider>
  • (if consumer, please add....)
    • OSLC Asset Management 2.0 Providers tested with:
      • (list out providers)

Additional details about support: (not noted in table)

  • Subset of specs supported and why:
    • ...
  • Deviations from specs and why:
    • ...

Issues:

  1. <issues>

Worked well:

  • <good things>
Edit | Attach | Print version | History: r4 < r3 < r2 < r1 | Backlinks | Raw View | Raw edit | More topic actions...
Topic revision: r1 - 06 Mar 2012 - 18:58:21 - SheehanAnderson
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Copyright � by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Contributions are governed by our Terms of Use
Ideas, requests, problems regarding this site? Send feedback