[Oslc-steeringcommittee] 15-day Public Review for Product Life Cycle Support V1.0

Schulte, Mark D mark.d.schulte at boeing.com
Thu Sep 5 11:14:20 EDT 2013


From my standpoint, having become engaged with the StC has helped me be more aware of related standards work (as with the TestIF interface std at the OMG) which seem to have parallel or overlapping interest in the areas of linking data and related work with data exchange.  I am not entirely sure yet how the StC views that but it would seem to me that when we run into those kinds of things we should try to ascertain whether they are doing something which conflicts or relates or parallels our own specifications that are in work, and if so, at a minimum exchange information with those thought leaders on the OSLC approach and specifications being developed.

For example, having a particular interface for defining XML std data for exchanging test information between tools as well as an OSLC Quality spec for defining test-related linked data queries, would seem to signal a couple of things.  Vendors have to support multiple ways to exchange or link data between tools to cover the bases.  And as a user of tools in a systems or software engineering toolchain, I don’t want to find that some of my preferred tools support exchange of data with one std (import/export) while other tools do not, but instead support an OSLC interface.  Essentially, multiple conflicting but related standards don’t really help my long term integration problems.

Of course,  I realize that we can’t get alignments in this area any time soon and I know we don’t have the resources to engage and work all of the parallel efforts that may come up,  but I think engaging as much as we can with these other organizations will help at least increase awareness and perhaps help us understand any gaps in what we are doing.

Steve,
With respect to this one in particular, since it was within OASIS already, I just thought maybe someone already knew something about and could provide an overview and comment on whether it was related to our work or really covering something totally different.

Thanks,

Mark

From: Steve K Speicher [mailto:sspeiche at us.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 8:18 AM
To: Schulte, Mark D
Cc: oslc-steeringcommittee at open-services.net
Subject: Re: [Oslc-steeringcommittee] 15-day Public Review for Product Life Cycle Support V1.0

Hi Mark and all,

I have been doing some learning on this but had a question on clarification on what is expected from me:
- Are you looking for a summary or this effort?
- Perhaps stated a different way, what level of understanding do the Steering Committee members have about this effort?
- I'd be interested to hear any thoughts on synergies, please send to me and I can consolidate into a report.

Thanks,
Steve Speicher
IBM Rational Software
OSLC - Lifecycle integration inspired by the web -> http://open-services.net<http://open-services.net/>



From:        "Schulte, Mark D" <mark.d.schulte at boeing.com<mailto:mark.d.schulte at boeing.com>>
To:        "oslc-steeringcommittee at open-services.net<mailto:oslc-steeringcommittee at open-services.net>" <oslc-steeringcommittee at open-services.net<mailto:oslc-steeringcommittee at open-services.net>>
Date:        08/14/2013 07:19 AM
Subject:        [Oslc-steeringcommittee] 15-day Public Review for Product Life        Cycle Support V1.0
Sent by:        "Oslc-steeringcommittee" <oslc-steeringcommittee-bounces at open-services.net<mailto:oslc-steeringcommittee-bounces at open-services.net>>
________________________________



I was just curious as to whether others had seen this.


The OASIS Product Life Cycle Support (PLCS) TC (which I know nothing about) sent out information on a review last week that sounded like it would have some relationship to the same things we are doing here with OSLC, although perhaps that is not quite the case.  Is this a concern?

“to establish structured data exchange and sharing capabilities for use by industry to support complex engineered assets throughout their total life cycle. The OASIS Product Life Cycle Support (PLCS) standard is defined by Data Exchange Specifications (DEX) that are based upon ISO 10303 (STEP) Application Protocol 239 Product Life Cycle Support. This draft includes the PLCS library, templates, derived SysML and XML models and associated reference data.”

Is there any synergy needed between this effort and the OSLC work?


Mark D. Schulte, Associate Technical Fellow
Systems, Software, PLM & ESML Engineering
Boeing Defense Systems
The Boeing Company<http://www.boeing.com/>
mark.d.schulte at boeing.com<mailto:mark.d.schulte at boeing.com>
Office: +1 314-777-7331
[CopperMedallion]


----- Message from Chet Ensign <chet.ensign at oasis-open.org<mailto:chet.ensign at oasis-open.org>> on Mon, 5 Aug 2013 22:09:54 +0000 -----
To:

"tc-announce at lists.oasis-open.org<mailto:tc-announce at lists.oasis-open.org>" <tc-announce at lists.oasis-open.org<mailto:tc-announce at lists.oasis-open.org>>, "members at lists.oasis-open.org<mailto:members at lists.oasis-open.org>" <members at lists.oasis-open.org<mailto:members at lists.oasis-open.org>>, "plcs at lists.oasis-open.org<mailto:plcs at lists.oasis-open.org>" <plcs at lists.oasis-open.org<mailto:plcs at lists.oasis-open.org>>

Subject:

[members] 15-day Public Review for Product Life Cycle Support V1.0


The OASIS Product Life Cycle Support (PLCS) TC members [1] have produced an updated Committee Specification Draft (CSD) and submitted this specification for 15-day public review:

Product Life Cycle Support Version 1.0
Committee Specification Draft 02 / Public Review Draft 02
19 July 2013

Specification Overview:

The purpose of the OASIS Product Life Cycle Support (PLCS) standard is to establish structured data exchange and sharing capabilities for use by industry to support complex engineered assets throughout their total life cycle. The OASIS Product Life Cycle Support (PLCS) standard is defined by Data Exchange Specifications (DEX) that are based upon ISO 10303 (STEP) Application Protocol 239 Product Life Cycle Support. This draft includes the PLCS library, templates, derived SysML and XML models and associated reference data.

Please note that this Committee Specification Draft is a highly interlinked collection of HTML documents. The navigation links on the top and in the left column provide accesss to the components of the draft. The link to Help on the navigation links includes an explanation of the organization of the material. The Help topic "PLCSlib navigation" explains how to use the interface.

TC Description:

The TC is currently developing templates for deployment of the ISO 10303-239 standard, together with associated SysML and XML models to facilitate implementation. It is intended that the work be adopted by ISO.

Public Review Period:

The public review starts 6 August 2013 at 00:00 GMT and ends 21 August 2013 at 23:59 GMT. The specification was previously submitted for public review [2].

This is an open invitation to comment. OASIS solicits feedback from potential users, developers and others, whether OASIS members or not, for the sake of improving the interoperability and quality of its technical work.

Due to the complex structure of the material, the TC requests that, when making a comment, you prefix the comment with a label identifying the artifact against which the comment is made:

- For comments against the PLCS Platform Specific Model: EXPRESS information model, use "(plcs-psm.exp)."

- For comments against the PLCS Platform Specific Model: SysML information model, use "(plcs-psm.xmi)."

- For comments against the XML Schema, use "(plcs-psm.xsd)."

- For comments against the Schematron, use "(plcs-psm.sch)."

- For comments against the PLCS Platform Specific Model: OWL Reference Data, use "(plcs-psm-en.owl)."

- For comments against the PLCS OWL Reference Data, use "(plcs-rdl-en.owl)."

- For comments against a template, use "Template: <template name>."

The members of the TC thank reviewers in advance for helping to make the comments traceable.

URIs:
The prose specification document and related files are available here:

HTML (Authoritative):
http://docs.oasis-open.org/plcs/plcslib/v1.0/csprd02/plcslib-v1.0-csprd02.html

PDF (Cover pages only with links to specification):
http://docs.oasis-open.org/plcs/plcslib/v1.0/csprd02/plcslib-v1.0-csprd02.pdf

ZIP distribution files (complete):

For your convenience, OASIS provides a complete package of the prose specification and related files in a ZIP distribution file. You can download the ZIP file here:

http://docs.oasis-open.org/plcs/plcslib/v1.0/csprd02/plcslib-v1.0-csprd02.zip

Additional information about this specification and the PLCS TC may be found on the TC's public home page located at:

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/plcs/

Comments may be submitted to the TC by any person through the use of the OASIS TC Comment Facility which can be accessed by following the instructions at "Send A Comment" at the top of the TC public home page, or directly at:

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/comments/form.php?wg_abbrev=plcs

Feedback submitted by TC non-members for this work and for other work of this TC is publicly archived and can be viewed at:

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/plcs-comment/

All comments submitted to OASIS are subject to the OASIS Feedback License, which ensures that the feedback you provide carries the same obligations at least as the obligations of the TC members. In connection with this public review of "Product Life Cycle Support Version 1.0", we call your attention to the OASIS IPR Policy [3] applicable especially [4] to the work of this technical committee. All members of the TC should be familiar with this document, which may create obligations regarding the disclosure and availability of a member's patent, copyright, trademark and license rights that read on an approved OASIS specification. OASIS invites any persons who know of any such claims to disclose these if they may be essential to the implementation of the above specification, so that notice of them may be posted to the notice page for this TC's work.

========== Additional references:

[1] OASIS Product Life Cycle Support (PLCS) TC
https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/plcs

[2] Previous public reviews:
30-day public review, 27 March 2013: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/201303/msg00007.html
Comment resolution log: http://docs.oasis-open.org/plcs/plcslib/v1.0/csprd01/plcs-plcslib-v1.0-csprd01-issues.xls

[3] https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/ipr

[4] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/plcs/ipr.php
https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/ipr#s10.2.3
RF on Limited Terms Mode


/chet
----------------
Chet Ensign
Director of Standards Development and TC Administration
OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
http://www.oasis-open.org<http://www.oasis-open.org/>

Primary: +1 973-996-2298
Mobile: +1 201-341-1393






---------------------------------------------------------------------

This email list is used solely by OASIS for official consortium communications.

Opt-out requests may be sent to member-services at oasis-open.org<mailto:member-services at oasis-open.org>, however, all members are strongly encouraged to maintain a subscription to this list.

_______________________________________________
Oslc-steeringcommittee mailing list
Oslc-steeringcommittee at open-services.net<mailto:Oslc-steeringcommittee at open-services.net>
http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-steeringcommittee_open-services.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-steeringcommittee_open-services.net/attachments/20130905/f05a2885/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 4317 bytes
Desc: image001.gif
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-steeringcommittee_open-services.net/attachments/20130905/f05a2885/attachment.gif>


More information about the Oslc-steeringcommittee mailing list