[Oslc-steeringcommittee] Request to Approve OSLC Performance Monitoring V2 to transition to Final

[Mik Kersten]

+1

Mik

On May 15, 2013, at 1:06 AM, <david.e.ingram at accenture.com> wrote:

> +1
>  
> David E. Ingram
> Managing Director – Technology, Delivery Enablement
> Accenture
> Email: david.e.ingram at accenture.com
> Direct Dial: +44 (0) 20 7844 7190
> Mobile: +44 (0) 7801415128
> EA: Renée Fletcher
> renee.fletcher at accenture.com
> Direct Dial: +44 (0)  20 7844 5105
>  
> This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the e-mail by you is prohibited. Where allowed by local law, electronic communications with Accenture and its affiliates, including e-mail and instant messaging (including content),  may be scanned by our systems for the purposes of information security and assessment of internal compliance with Accenture policy.
> 
> Accenture means Accenture (UK) Limited (registered number 4757301), registered in England and Wales with registered address at 30 Fenchurch Street, London EC3M 3BD.
>  
> From: Oslc-steeringcommittee [mailto:oslc-steeringcommittee-bounces at open-services.net] On Behalf Of Steve K Speicher
> Sent: 14 May 2013 19:33
> To: oslc-steeringcommittee at open-services.net
> Cc: oslc-pm at open-services.net; Arthur Ryman
> Subject: [Oslc-steeringcommittee] Request to Approve OSLC Performance Monitoring V2 to transition to Final
>  
> Hello Steering Committee:
> 
> I'm requesting on behalf of the Performance Monitoring Working Group an approval of the OSLC Performance Monitoring V2 specification [1] and a subset of Estimation and Measurement (ESM) V2 specification [2] to transition to final by email. 
> Note: Since PerfMon needed almost exactly the same vocabulary terms drafted in ESM, they worked with ESM and Core WGs to finalize the needed subset [2].
> 
> The Core WG is satisfied with this specification [3], an Implementation Report is available [4], and a Test Suite [5] is in place.
> 
> As stated in the Bylaws, a super majority vote is required [6]. Therefore 4 "+1" replies on this thread, are needed to approve the OSLC Performance Monitoring V2 specification. If we do not receive those replies before an upcoming StC meeting, I will request to take some agenda time to cover this.
> While 4 "+1" replies are required to approve the Specification, please don't hesitate to add your +1 even if you are the fifth or sixth to do so. 
> 
> Special thanks to Julianne Bielski (OSLC PerfMon WG Lead), Arthur Ryman (OSLC ESM WG Lead) and the rest of the PerfMon working group for the contributions.
> [1]: http://open-services.net/wiki/performance-monitoring/OSLC-Performance-Monitoring-Specification-Version-2.0/
> [2]: http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-pm_open-services.net/2013-March/000119.html
> [3]: http://open-services.net/wiki/core/Meeting20130410/#Minutes
> [4]: http://open-services.net/wiki/performance-monitoring/ImplementationReports/
> [5]: http://git.eclipse.org/c/lyo/org.eclipse.lyo.testsuite.git/commit/?id=27d4ab2710f28421fdcdc436713b94e7674185f1
> [6]: http://open-services.net/bylaws/#steering-committee "Duties and Responsibilities > SUPER MAJORITY VOTE 
> 
> Thanks, 
> Steve Speicher
> IBM Rational Software
> OSLC - Lifecycle integration inspired by the web -> http://open-services.net 
> 
> ----- Forwarded by Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/IBM on 05/14/2013 01:30 PM ----- 
> 
> From:        Julianne Bielski/Raleigh/IBM at IBMUS 
> To:        oslc-core at open-services.net 
> Date:        05/10/2013 04:04 PM 
> Subject:        [oslc-core] request for Perf Mon spec finalization by OSLC steering        committee 
> Sent by:        "Oslc-Core" <oslc-core-bounces at open-services.net>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Core team,
> 
> Per the April 10th core meeting minutes (http://open-services.net/wiki/core/Meeting20130410/), I had the following to-do's to finalize the Performance Monitoring Domain Specification 2.0:
> 
> PerfMon is requesting to go final
> Need to list additional implementations, only have 1 provider but are at least 3 consumers that are known of
> Need to list test suite (and also work to merge in contribution)
> Update text in beginning of document to remove ‘red’ text warning about version numbering to match that of Recon spec
> 
> 
> In the implementation reports I now have 1 provider and 4 consumers and I have updated that link accordingly.
> The test suite code has been checked in and re-validated and and implementation report created
> Requested text updates to the spec have been made
> 
> -- Regards,
> 
> Julianne Bielski, STSM
> ITM Infrastructure Chief Architect
> Cloud & Smarter Infrastructure, IBM Software Group
> tel: (919) 224-1170      (T/L) 687-1170
> e-mail: bielsk at us.ibm.com
> 
> "All growth is a leap in the dark, a spontaneous unpremeditated act without benefit of experience." — Henry Miller_______________________________________________
> Oslc-Core mailing list
> Oslc-Core at open-services.net
> http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net
> _______________________________________________
> Oslc-steeringcommittee mailing list
> Oslc-steeringcommittee at open-services.net
> http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-steeringcommittee_open-services.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-steeringcommittee_open-services.net/attachments/20130515/8db9a2f5/attachment-0003.html>