[Oslc-steeringcommittee] Request to Approve OSLC Performance Monitoring V2 to transition to Final

[david.e.ingram at accenture.com]

+1

David E. Ingram
Managing Director – Technology, Delivery Enablement
Accenture
Email: david.e.ingram at accenture.com<mailto:david.e.ingram at accenture.com>
Direct Dial: +44 (0) 20 7844 7190
Mobile: +44 (0) 7801415128

EA: Renée Fletcher
renee.fletcher at accenture.com<mailto:Renee.fletcher at accenture.com>
Direct Dial: +44 (0)  20 7844 5105


This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the e-mail by you is prohibited. Where allowed by local law, electronic communications with Accenture and its affiliates, including e-mail and instant messaging (including content), may be scanned by our systems for the purposes of information security and assessment of internal compliance with Accenture policy.

Accenture means Accenture (UK) Limited (registered number 4757301), registered in England and Wales with registered address at 30 Fenchurch Street, London EC3M 3BD.

From: Oslc-steeringcommittee [mailto:oslc-steeringcommittee-bounces at open-services.net] On Behalf Of Steve K Speicher
Sent: 14 May 2013 19:33
To: oslc-steeringcommittee at open-services.net
Cc: oslc-pm at open-services.net; Arthur Ryman
Subject: [Oslc-steeringcommittee] Request to Approve OSLC Performance Monitoring V2 to transition to Final

Hello Steering Committee:

I'm requesting on behalf of the Performance Monitoring Working Group an approval of the OSLC Performance Monitoring V2 specification [1] and a subset of Estimation and Measurement (ESM) V2 specification [2] to transition to final by email.
Note: Since PerfMon needed almost exactly the same vocabulary terms drafted in ESM, they worked with ESM and Core WGs to finalize the needed subset [2].

The Core WG is satisfied with this specification [3], an Implementation Report is available [4], and a Test Suite [5] is in place.

As stated in the Bylaws, a super majority vote is required [6]. Therefore 4 "+1" replies on this thread, are needed to approve the OSLC Performance Monitoring V2 specification. If we do not receive those replies before an upcoming StC meeting, I will request to take some agenda time to cover this.
While 4 "+1" replies are required to approve the Specification, please don't hesitate to add your +1 even if you are the fifth or sixth to do so.

Special thanks to Julianne Bielski (OSLC PerfMon WG Lead), Arthur Ryman (OSLC ESM WG Lead) and the rest of the PerfMon working group for the contributions.

[1]: http://open-services.net/wiki/performance-monitoring/OSLC-Performance-Monitoring-Specification-Version-2.0/
[2]: http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-pm_open-services.net/2013-March/000119.html
[3]: http://open-services.net/wiki/core/Meeting20130410/#Minutes
[4]: http://open-services.net/wiki/performance-monitoring/ImplementationReports/
[5]: http://git.eclipse.org/c/lyo/org.eclipse.lyo.testsuite.git/commit/?id=27d4ab2710f28421fdcdc436713b94e7674185f1
[6]: http://open-services.net/bylaws/#steering-committee "Duties and Responsibilities > SUPER MAJORITY VOTE

Thanks,
Steve Speicher
IBM Rational Software
OSLC - Lifecycle integration inspired by the web -> http://open-services.net<http://open-services.net/>

----- Forwarded by Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/IBM on 05/14/2013 01:30 PM -----

From:        Julianne Bielski/Raleigh/IBM at IBMUS
To:        oslc-core at open-services.net<mailto:oslc-core at open-services.net>
Date:        05/10/2013 04:04 PM
Subject:        [oslc-core] request for Perf Mon spec finalization by OSLC steering        committee
Sent by:        "Oslc-Core" <oslc-core-bounces at open-services.net<mailto:oslc-core-bounces at open-services.net>>

________________________________



Core team,

Per the April 10th core meeting minutes (http://open-services.net/wiki/core/Meeting20130410/), I had the following to-do's to finalize the Performance Monitoring Domain Specification 2.0:

PerfMon is requesting to go final<http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/2013-April/001601.html>

  *   Need to list additional implementations, only have 1 provider but are at least 3 consumers that are known of
  *   Need to list test suite (and also work to merge in contribution)
  *   Update text in beginning of document to remove ‘red’ text warning about version numbering to match that of Recon spec


In the implementation reports I now have 1 provider and 4 consumers and I have updated that link accordingly.
The test suite code has been checked in and re-validated and and implementation report created
Requested text updates to the spec have been made

-- Regards,

Julianne Bielski, STSM
ITM Infrastructure Chief Architect
Cloud & Smarter Infrastructure, IBM Software Group
tel: (919) 224-1170      (T/L) 687-1170
e-mail: bielsk at us.ibm.com<mailto:bielsk at us.ibm.com>

"All growth is a leap in the dark, a spontaneous unpremeditated act without benefit of experience." — Henry Miller_______________________________________________
Oslc-Core mailing list
Oslc-Core at open-services.net<mailto:Oslc-Core at open-services.net>
http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-steeringcommittee_open-services.net/attachments/20130515/4de8e54a/attachment-0003.html>