[Oslc-steeringcommittee] Agenda Updates and HOMEWORK for the June 7 F2F meeting

Mon May 27 12:50:10 EDT 2013

Hi Sean,
here is my input for topic 6 of the F2F StC Meeting (preliminary, unsorted):

-          build up liaison relationships with other organizations
(as listed with topic 3 plus additional ...)

-          continue recruiting effort with major players/tool providers
(SAP, Microsoft, HP, PLM vendors, ...)
define process how to proceed (e.g. via StC focal point)

-          define list of next level technical challenges to address
(e.g., TRS->data warehouse, common role/right models,
orchestration of loose coupled environments, ...)

-          foster increase of adoption level
(various platforms: Lyo, EU projects, vendor contacts, ...)

-          PR, PR, PR ...
at conference, publications, own conferences, ...
=> seek for funding from OASIS

-          increase community participation through User Groups

-          Start discussion about boundaries of OSLC
e.g., OSLC vs. LDP, adoption outside engineering environments,
interoperability areas where tight coupling is required, ...

-          continues assessment reports:
ask the communications UG for a regular report on OSLC KPIs
(e.g. number of: new users, new contributions on Lyo, released specs,
supporting organizations, liaisons with other orgs, ...)

I assume there will be some overlap of the topics provided by the StC members.
Could you do us a favor to combine the topics to a summary list to be discussed?
We could sort them in higher and lower prio topics and maybe assign owners
(e.g. StC member as sponsor, WG to workout concept, ...)

I have an additional topic for the agenda of the StC meeting: Steering committee voting right vs.  other MS voting rights?
See e-mail attached with the question from Barbara Erbes to our OASIS primary contact:
"..  you have given Rainer Ersch the approval to be on the steering committee, but I need to know if you want to be in the member section as the voting member or are you passing that right to Rainer .."
I can only seek for the voting right if we have clear voting rules. I assumed that all the voting right related to the MS are with the StC. The e-mail from Barb indicates that there is a difference - which?
Can you please add this to the agenda? We may need Dave or someone from OASIS to make a proposal. Otherwise we will end up with a StC with unclear voting rights.

Bye and have a nice day
Rainer

From: Oslc-steeringcommittee [mailto:oslc-steeringcommittee-bounces at open-services.net] On Behalf Of Sean Kennedy
Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2013 12:00 AM
To: oslc-steeringcommittee at open-services.net
Subject: [Oslc-steeringcommittee] Agenda Updates and HOMEWORK for the June 7 F2F meeting

Hello OSLC Steering Committee members:

I have updated the agenda for the June 7 F2F meeting [1].

To help keep us on time, I am asking all presenters to provide executive summaries of their topic, and a specific statement of what is being asked of the Steering Committee (if anything; e.g. a proposal to be voted on), seven (7) days in advance of the meeting date (i.e. Friday, May 31).

For the June 7 meeting, topic 6, "Goals for OSLC" [2], requires input from each of you, and I would ask you to provide it by responding to this email.
What input? Topic 6 includes:
"Let each Steering Committee member share his or her goals for OSLC over the next 12-36 months. [2-3m, ea. = ~15m]"
And I would ask for an executive summary of your thoughts on this topic.

You may wish to start by consider the "Aspirations for OSLC" that we first presented in the February webcast and then again on the OASIS analysts call. i.e.:
* Foundational technology for all integration
* The household name for integrations
* Natural choice for standardizing loosely-coupled integrations in new domains

You may also want to consider your response along several dimensions including (but not limited to):
* membership
* process and technical results
* community and participation
* ubiquity and adoption
* implementations

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

I look forward to reading your responses and seeing you in Orlando.

[1]: http://open-services.net/wiki/steering-committee/1306-StC-Meeting/
[2]: http://open-services.net/wiki/steering-committee/1306-StC-Meeting/#A6

Best regards,

________________________________

Sean Kennedy

[IBM]

OSLC Community Development Leader for IBM Rational

Operations Coordinator for the OSLC Steering Committee

Phone:

+1-905-413-4385

8200 Warden Ave

Fax:

+1-905-413-4850

Markham, Ontario L6G 1C7

Email:

seanpk at ca.ibm.com<mailto:seanpk at ca.ibm.com>

D1/R0A/8200/MKM

LinkedIn:

http://www.linkedin.com/in/seanpk

Canada

________________________________

[cid:image002.gif at 01CE59ED.9E6BA8E0]

OSLC: Lifecycle integration inspired by the web

http://open-services.net

Eclipse Lyo: Enabling tool integration with OSLC

http://eclipse.org/lyo

There is nothing more powerful than an idea whose time has come. -- Victor Hugo

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-steeringcommittee_open-services.net/attachments/20130527/1ffbf0c1/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 1851 bytes
Desc: image001.gif
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-steeringcommittee_open-services.net/attachments/20130527/1ffbf0c1/attachment-0002.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 1651 bytes
Desc: image002.gif
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-steeringcommittee_open-services.net/attachments/20130527/1ffbf0c1/attachment-0003.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Dave Ings <ings at ca.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: FW: Member Section OSLC
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 17:23:31 +0000
Size: 18520
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-steeringcommittee_open-services.net/attachments/20130527/1ffbf0c1/attachment-0001.mht>