[Oslc-steeringcommittee] Request to Approve OSLC Performance Monitoring V2 to transition to Final

[Steve K Speicher]

Hello Steering Committee:

I'm requesting on behalf of the Performance Monitoring Working Group an 
approval of the OSLC Performance Monitoring V2 specification [1] and a 
subset of Estimation and Measurement (ESM) V2 specification [2] to 
transition to final by email.
Note: Since PerfMon needed almost exactly the same vocabulary terms 
drafted in ESM, they worked with ESM and Core WGs to finalize the needed 
subset [2].

The Core WG is satisfied with this specification [3], an Implementation 
Report is available [4], and a Test Suite [5] is in place.

As stated in the Bylaws, a super majority vote is required [6]. Therefore 
4 "+1" replies on this thread, are needed to approve the OSLC Performance 
Monitoring V2 specification. If we do not receive those replies before an 
upcoming StC meeting, I will request to take some agenda time to cover 
this.
While 4 "+1" replies are required to approve the Specification, please 
don't hesitate to add your +1 even if you are the fifth or sixth to do so.

Special thanks to Julianne Bielski (OSLC PerfMon WG Lead), Arthur Ryman 
(OSLC ESM WG Lead) and the rest of the PerfMon working group for the 
contributions.
[1]: 
http://open-services.net/wiki/performance-monitoring/OSLC-Performance-Monitoring-Specification-Version-2.0/

[2]: 
http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-pm_open-services.net/2013-March/000119.html

[3]: http://open-services.net/wiki/core/Meeting20130410/#Minutes
[4]: 
http://open-services.net/wiki/performance-monitoring/ImplementationReports/

[5]: 
http://git.eclipse.org/c/lyo/org.eclipse.lyo.testsuite.git/commit/?id=27d4ab2710f28421fdcdc436713b94e7674185f1

[6]: http://open-services.net/bylaws/#steering-committee "Duties and 
Responsibilities > SUPER MAJORITY VOTE 

Thanks,
Steve Speicher
IBM Rational Software
OSLC - Lifecycle integration inspired by the web -> 
http://open-services.net

----- Forwarded by Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/IBM on 05/14/2013 01:30 PM 
-----

From:   Julianne Bielski/Raleigh/IBM at IBMUS
To:     oslc-core at open-services.net
Date:   05/10/2013 04:04 PM
Subject:        [oslc-core] request for Perf Mon spec finalization by OSLC 
steering        committee
Sent by:        "Oslc-Core" <oslc-core-bounces at open-services.net>



Core team,

Per the April 10th core meeting minutes (
http://open-services.net/wiki/core/Meeting20130410/), I had the following 
to-do's to finalize the Performance Monitoring Domain Specification 2.0:

PerfMon is requesting to go final 
Need to list additional implementations, only have 1 provider but are at 
least 3 consumers that are known of 
Need to list test suite (and also work to merge in contribution) 
Update text in beginning of document to remove ‘red’ text warning about 
version numbering to match that of Recon spec


In the implementation reports I now have 1 provider and 4 consumers and I 
have updated that link accordingly.
The test suite code has been checked in and re-validated and and 
implementation report created
Requested text updates to the spec have been made

-- Regards,

Julianne Bielski, STSM
ITM Infrastructure Chief Architect
Cloud & Smarter Infrastructure, IBM Software Group
tel: (919) 224-1170      (T/L) 687-1170
e-mail: bielsk at us.ibm.com

"All growth is a leap in the dark, a spontaneous unpremeditated act 
without benefit of experience." — Henry Miller
_______________________________________________
Oslc-Core mailing list
Oslc-Core at open-services.net
http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-steeringcommittee_open-services.net/attachments/20130514/f225aa7f/attachment-0001.html>