[Oslc-steeringcommittee] Effective monthly meetings

[Mik Kersten]

+1 for greater focus, and I'm OK with the 90 min as needed.

--
Dr. @mik_kersten, CEO, http://tasktop.com 
Assistant: sarah.ryan at tasktop.com, +1-778-588-6896

On 2013-06-10, at 1:02 PM, "Keis, Andreas" <Andreas.Keis at eads.com> wrote:

> OK for me.
> 
> Andreas
> 
> Sent using BlackBerry
>  
> From: John Wiegand [mailto:John_Wiegand at us.ibm.com] 
> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 09:01 PM
> To: oslc-steeringcommittee at open-services.net <oslc-steeringcommittee at open-services.net> 
> Subject: [Oslc-steeringcommittee] Effective monthly meetings 
>  
> I hope everyone has safely made it to their destination (or at least an intentional in-between location). 
> 
> Rainer and I had a passing conversation as we left Friday afternoon.  We didn't come to any specific conclusion, but we did raise a challenge topic: effective use of our Steering Committee time. 
> 
> There are several areas where we want to make progress.  However, in a one hour meeting, we can either work through several simple topics or explore one more challenging topic, but we don't really have sufficient time to do more than that.   
> 
> We didn't come to a conclusion, but we did propose some alternatives: meetings with greater focus, careful prioritization, extend our meeting slot to 90 mins to support time to do more. 
> 
> Are you open to the 90 minute meeting slot? 
> 
> Do you have other thoughts on this?   
> 
> take care, 
> John_______________________________________________
> Oslc-steeringcommittee mailing list
> Oslc-steeringcommittee at open-services.net
> http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-steeringcommittee_open-services.net