[Oslc-steeringcommittee] OSLC Automation V2 specification final approval -- VOTE REQUESTED

[Michael F Fiedler]

Rainer,  Thanks for catching that.   I've marked it resolved on 19 April,
2012 - that was just an oversight.

I will move all RESOLVED issues to CLOSED once the specification is
approved and locked.

Regards,
Mike

Michael Fiedler
IBM Rational Software
fiedler at us.ibm.com
919-254-4170

"Ersch, Rainer" <rainer.ersch at siemens.com> wrote on 01/18/2013 10:06:23 AM:

> "Ersch, Rainer" <rainer.ersch at siemens.com>
> 01/18/2013 10:06 AM
>
> To
>
> Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/IBM at IBMUS, "oslc-steeringcommittee at open-
> services.net" <oslc-steeringcommittee at open-services.net>,
>
> cc
>
> Michael F Fiedler/Durham/IBM at IBMUS, John Arwe/Poughkeepsie/IBM at IBMUS
>
> Subject
>
> RE: [Oslc-steeringcommittee] OSLC Automation V2 specification final
> approval -- VOTE REQUESTED
>
> +1
>
> Question (not blocking my approval above):
>       there is still one open issue for the Automation Specification
> Version 2.0.
>       Shouldn’t open issues change to “DEFERRED” or “TABLED” before
> finalization, if they cannot be resolved?
>
> Bye and have a nice day
> Rainer
>
>
>
>
> From: Oslc-steeringcommittee [mailto:oslc-steeringcommittee-
> bounces at open-services.net] On Behalf Of Steve K Speicher
> Sent: Freitag, 18. Januar 2013 15:32
> To: oslc-steeringcommittee at open-services.net
> Cc: Michael F Fiedler; John Arwe
> Subject: [Oslc-steeringcommittee] OSLC Automation V2 specification
> final approval -- VOTE REQUESTED
>
> Hello OSLC Steering Committee,
>
> I am writing to you requesting your approval to transition OSLC
> Automation 2.0 [1] to final specification phase.  The Automation WG
> has completed the needed requirements (see below), including Core WG
> review and approval [6].
>
> The goal is to handle this approval off-line, so please respond to
> this email: +1 approve -1 disapprove (reasons why).  This requires a
> 2/3 approval [7].  Feel free to reach out to me or Automation WG
> leads (Michael Fiedler and John Arwe), if there are any questions.
>
>
> [6] - http://open-services.net/wiki/core/Meeting20121212/
> [7] - http://open-services.net/bylaws/#steering-committee
>
> Thanks,
> Steve Speicher
> IBM Rational Software
> OSLC - Lifecycle integration inspired by the web ->
http://open-services.net
> ----- Forwarded by Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/IBM on 01/18/2013 09:22 AM
-----
>
> From:        Michael F Fiedler/Durham/IBM at IBMUS
> To:        oslc-core at open-services.net, oslc-steeringcommittee at open-
> services.net,
> Cc:        oslc-automation at open-services.net
> Date:        12/10/2012 08:54 AM
> Subject:        [Oslc-steeringcommittee] OSLC Automation V2
> specification        requesting final approval
> Sent by:        "Oslc-steeringcommittee" <oslc-steeringcommittee-
> bounces at open-services.net>
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> The OSLC Automation V2 specification [1] has now been in
> finalization since 1 November and the spec has not undergone any
> further changes.   The workgroup is now requesting that the Core
> workgroup and OSLC steering committee approve the specification as
> final.   In addition to the specification itself, the following
> assets in support of the specification are available:
>
>     - 4 implementation reports [2].  Three from provider
> implementations by IBM Rational, IBM Tivoli and Eclipse Lyo plus a
> consumer implementation in the form of the Eclipse Lyo OSLC test
> suite for the Automation spec
>     - a test suite in Eclipse Lyo [3] [4]
>     - a primer document [5] linking the scenarios to the
> specification.   This is still in progress with a target to complete
> in January.
>     - discussions in progress for implementations by other
> commercial and open source tools
>
> If there are any concerns with this specification being declared
> final, please raise them now.    This topic will be on the agenda at
> next week's Core workgroup meeting and (tentatively) at the January
> steering committee meeting.
>
> Thank you to all workgroup members for your participation and
> contributions in getting the specification to this stage.
>
> [1] - http://open-services.net/wiki/automation/OSLC-Automation-
> Specification-Version-2.0/
> [2] - http://open-services.net/wiki/automation/OSLC-Automation-
> Implementation-Reports-2.0/
> [3] -
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Lyo/LyoTestSuite#OSLC_Specifications_Covered
> [4] - https://git.eclipse.org/c/lyo/org.eclipse.lyo.testsuite.git/
> tree/org.eclipse.lyo.testsuite.server/src/main/java/org/eclipse/lyo/
> testsuite/oslcv2/auto
> [5] -
http://open-services.net/wiki/automation/OSLC-Automation-Primer-2.0/
>
>
> Regards,
> Mike
>
> Michael Fiedler
> IBM Rational Software
> fiedler at us.ibm.com
> 919-254-4170_______________________________________________
> Oslc-steeringcommittee mailing list
> Oslc-steeringcommittee at open-services.net
> http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-
> steeringcommittee_open-services.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-steeringcommittee_open-services.net/attachments/20130118/9b83a561/attachment-0003.html>