[oslc-rm] Agenda for Monday's call (7th March)

[Ian Green1]

Agenda for Monday's meeting (7th March, 4pm GMT) can be found at [1].

I'm hoping to discuss Andy's document so please try to have taken a look at
that.    On the requirement organization topic, Dominic suggested what I
think is a useful motivating scenario to consider - reporting over a system
requirements specification.  Here the ordered aspect of the tree of
requirements is essential to its meaning and cannot be lost.  There are
also elements such as parent/child and headings, as mentioned in Andy's
document.

Perhaps a concrete question might be:  how would a specification (eg [2])
be surfaced in an RM resource model?  Maybe if we could make progress on
this, or something like it, we might be able to refine/revise Andy's
taxonomy further?

[1] http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/RmMeetings20110307
[2] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2616.txt


best wishes,
    -ian

ian.green at uk.ibm.com (Ian Green1/UK/IBM at IBMGB)
Chief Software Architect, Requirements Definition and Management
IBM Rational