[oslc-rm] Contributing scenarios to reporting workgroup
Ian Green1
ian.green at uk.ibm.com
Thu Mar 4 07:21:28 EST 2010
Hello Tack,
The OSLC RM workgroup has been looking at some scenarios relating to
traceability (see [1]). In our discussions it became evident that RM
alone cannot meaningfully make good progress in this area, since
traceability is not confined to a single domain. For example, "assessing
the impact of a proposed change" might have a scope that reaches beyond RM
into QM and AM.
Out current thinking is that such scenarios require two things:
- a means of describing the resources that are to be considered
for the impact analysis (resource type, relationships etc.)
- a means of remembering such a description so that progress on
dealing with the impacts can be monitored
The first feels very much like a query, of the sort that reporting has
been considering - in general it is cross-domain. The second, which we've
called a "traceability graph" is a resource that offers a way of tracking
progress, and also of including impacts that do not result from
traceability. We're focusing currently on the first of these - a way of
querying for "impacted" resources. (We're agreed that the graph idea is
interesting but can be investigated separately and, we think, without
affecting the query part.)
Do you agree that traceability analysis has some affinity with reporting?
There are certainly differences - one being that it seems necessary that
the traceability analysis has to be represented as a resource. Our hope
is that we can progress these scenarios - perhaps in collaboration with
your workgroup - do you have any comments?
If we don't have a cross-domain approach we could make progress but at the
cost of drawing (artificial) boundaries between RM, AM and QM, ...
best wishes,
-ian
ian.green at uk.ibm.com (Ian Green1/UK/IBM at IBMGB)
Chief Software Architect, Requirements Definition and Management
IBM Rational
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
More information about the Oslc-Rm
mailing list