[Oslc-recon] Comments on Recon spec

[Steve K Speicher]

+1 Agree with this change.

Thanks,
Steve Speicher
IBM Rational Software
OSLC - Lifecycle integration inspired by the web -> 
http://open-services.net

"Oslc-Recon" <oslc-recon-bounces at open-services.net> wrote on 02/26/2013 
04:30:48 PM:

> From: Tuan Dang/Raleigh/IBM at IBMUS
> To: oslc-recon at open-services.net
> Date: 02/26/2013 04:32 PM
> Subject: Re: [Oslc-recon] Comments on Recon spec
> Sent by: "Oslc-Recon" <oslc-recon-bounces at open-services.net>
> 
> >4) #Namespaces 2 
> >This statement seems like it does not help me (the reader) and just a 
> general statement about how the WG works.  If there were other 
> namespaces...I would expect it just to >say it uses the other ones here, 

> perhaps list them and then move on. 
> >"The OSLC Reconciliation workgroup MAY also re-use vocabulary terms 
from 
> other namespaces as needed after agreement on domain scenarios." 
> >change to: 
> >"The namespaces that represent re-used vocabulary terms are:
> >- http://open-services.net/ns/asset#Asset 
> >..." 
> >as a possibility. 
> 
> I've removed this paragraph as from a previous discussion, we had take 
out 
> oslc_asset:Asset. There is no longer a mention of other namespaces. 
> We'll add this back up in the future as we design reconciliation of 
> resources from another spec. 
> 
> Thanks ! T
> 
> Tuan Dang
> Tivoli OSLC governance, OSLC Reconciliation workgroup lead, Tivoli 
Common Data Model
> Internet: tdang at us.ibm.com
> phone: (919) 224-1242 T/L 
687-1242_______________________________________________
> Oslc-Recon mailing list
> Oslc-Recon at open-services.net
> http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-recon_open-services.net