[Oslc-recon] Comments on Recon spec

[Steve K Speicher]

+1 Agree with the changes.

Thanks,
Steve Speicher
IBM Rational Software
OSLC - Lifecycle integration inspired by the web -> 
http://open-services.net

"Oslc-Recon" <oslc-recon-bounces at open-services.net> wrote on 02/26/2013 
04:27:15 PM:

> From: Tuan Dang/Raleigh/IBM at IBMUS
> To: oslc-recon at open-services.net
> Date: 02/26/2013 04:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [Oslc-recon] Comments on Recon spec
> Sent by: "Oslc-Recon" <oslc-recon-bounces at open-services.net>
> 
> >1) Please remove/update the red warning text in the front to be like 
how 
> PerfMon and Auto used (not just removing red text).  It is very clear 
from 
> previous version that this is >the first version, don't need to 
reiterate. 
> >Namely:
> >"NOTE: This version of the specification has version 2.0 to indicate 
that 
> it is an OSLC Core 2.0 compliant specification. This specification is 
the 
> initial version of an OSLC >Reconciliation specification." 
> 
> done. 
> 
> >2) #Introduction 
> >The term "artifact" and other general terminology really don't help me 
know
> what this spec is about.  It would be helpful to include some specific 
> samples/examples of how it >might: computers, IT resources, etc 
> 
> I've an example using ComputerSystem in the intro paragraph 
> 
> >3) #Namespaces 1 
> >Namespaces should be hyperlinked so one can click on it to see the 
actual 
> vocabulary document. 
> 
> now hyperlinked to the crtv vocab page 
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks ! T
> 
> Tuan Dang
> Tivoli OSLC governance, OSLC Reconciliation workgroup lead, Tivoli 
Common Data Model
> Internet: tdang at us.ibm.com
> phone: (919) 224-1242 T/L 
687-1242_______________________________________________
> Oslc-Recon mailing list
> Oslc-Recon at open-services.net
> http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-recon_open-services.net