[Oslc-recon] Interesting history items around reviews/approvals related to Recon

[John Arwe]

To provide a bit more context for anyone following the emails but unable 
to attend the meeting: at this past week's meeting, two separate issues 
were discussed, amongst others.

First, the full name of CRTV, which Steve also posted as a comment on this 
mailing list [5].  Tuan and I talked with several of our prototype owners 
after the meeting.  We have agreement in principle that Steve's proposal 
to change the name is something they'll do, as long as they have some 
assurance that this can be the final name change.  Betas exist now, so 
these changes definitely incur cost to change documentation, and it's 
possible that translated messages would be affected too (as yet the 
research to definitely answer that question is not in).  Since OSLC Core 
is meeting next week, we'll ask them to agree on a name that's tolerable 
for them.  While that's no guarantee that someone (Core, Steering 
Committee, other reviewers) won't ask for changes in the future, it's 
better than nothing and Core's opinion should at least carry some weight.

Second, the choice of namespace URI for CRTV's terms.  Memories vary on 
whether or not the crtv shortname (as in http://open-services.net/ns/crtv#
) was ever assigned to the Reconciliation working group, but one certainty 
is that none of us so far are able to find any email archive or meeting 
minute evidence that it was assigned, so we'll also try to get that on 
Core's agenda for this week.  This case is particularly tortured, since 
CRTV was originally a proposal make to the Performance Monitoring WG 
(March 2012 roughly), but later moved to the Reconciliation working group 
(Sept 2012).

Since Tuan is a member of Core (as am I, but I'll be out that day), he can 
have the discussion and let the Reconciliation working group know what 
happens.  The agenda request is at [6].  Core meets Wed afternoon.


[5] 
http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-recon_open-services.net/2012-November/000010.html
[6] 
http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/2012-December/001520.html

Best Regards, John

Voice US 845-435-9470  BluePages
Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario


"Oslc-Recon" <oslc-recon-bounces at open-services.net> wrote on 12/04/2012 
04:00:16 PM:

> From: Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/IBM at IBMUS
> To: oslc-recon at open-services.net
> Date: 12/04/2012 04:03 PM
> Subject: [Oslc-recon] Interesting history items around reviews/
> approvals related to Recon
> Sent by: "Oslc-Recon" <oslc-recon-bounces at open-services.net>
> 
> Agreement from Core [1] on creation of Performance Monitoring WG [2]
> 
> New WG proposals for "Event Management" and this WG [3], and approval 
[4]
> 
> I don't see any discussion of internal spec names or assigning namespace 

> URIs
> 
> [1] - http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/OslcCoreMeetings20120208
> [2] - 
> http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/2012-
> January/001224.html
> [3] - 
> http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/2012-
> May/001325.html
> [4] - http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/OslcCoreMeetings20120530
> 
> Thanks,
> Steve Speicher
> IBM Rational Software
> OSLC - Lifecycle integration inspired by the web -> 
> http://open-services.net
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Oslc-Recon mailing list
> Oslc-Recon at open-services.net
> http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-recon_open-services.net
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-recon_open-services.net/attachments/20121208/9b832065/attachment-0003.html>