[Oslc-pm] should pm metrics be in the pm vocabulary

[John Arwe]

> What are people's opinions on making the metrics currently listed in
> the PM 2.0 draft spec part of the pm vocabulary as instances of 
> subclasses of ems:Metric rather than as additional ems:Metric instances? 


No strong preference either way.  Seems (a bit) more natural to me if the 
EMS vocabulary owns "all metric definitions in OSLC" since they did the 
original work.  However, RDF is certainly flexible enough for us to re-use 
that vocabulary without the owners helping overtly too.  I did/do note 
that the EMS wg has not met in a while, so if this boils down to logistics 
I'm all for doing what we need to do without imposing external delays on 
ourselves.  As long as we did the due diligence and coordinated with them, 
and we're not defining-new purely out of an absence of awareness, seems 
like we're good from a "desirable process" standpoint.

To the degree we have some reason for choosing one vs the other, should 
capture that in this thread.

Best Regards, John

Voice US 845-435-9470  BluePages
Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-pm_open-services.net/attachments/20120924/00daf134/attachment-0003.html>