[Oslc-pm] questions and comments on the Performance Monitoring spec and example RDF/XML - 7

[John Arwe]

Getting some offline discussion onto the mailing list.

> 7)  Will the Process resource be defined in CRTV or by the PerfMon 
> spec?   There seem to be some inconsistencies in the spec and 
> example RDF/XML: Should be in crtv now.
> 
> a)  The additional properties table for Performance Monitoring 
> record uses pm:process. 
> b)  The RDF/XML uses  <rdf:type rdf:resource="http:open-
> services.net/ns/perfmon#Process"/>
> c)  However,  there is a section in the PerfMon spec that defines 
> properties for Resource  crtv:Process  so that seems inconsistent 
> with the two items above. 


Julie responded: pm:process is correct, but I will change the RDF/XML to 
say: <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://open-services.net/ns/crtv#Process"/>

John adds: lower case process is a predicate (what in non-RDF space people 
would call a relationship type).  Upper case Process is a resource (RDFS 
Class) definition (...non-RDF object type).  They happen to be in 
different namespaces as well, but that is arguably an arbitrary choice 
(arbitrary in the sense that it's true, but a required feature for the 
rest of the discussion to be true).

Best Regards, John

Voice US 845-435-9470  BluePages
Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-pm_open-services.net/attachments/20120924/2ff47e99/attachment-0003.html>