[oslc-core] Changes made (was: Some issues with OSLC TRS 2.0 and alignment with recent LDP spec changes)

[Steve K Speicher]

Changes here: 
http://open-services.net/wiki/core/TrackedResourceSet-2.0/revision/4473/
Previous revision here: 
http://open-services.net/wiki/core/TrackedResourceSet-2.0/revision/4473

Details logged here: 
http://open-services.net/wiki/core/OSLC-Core-V2-Issues/#TrackedResourceSet-2.0-Issues

Have a nice day!

Steve Speicher
IBM Rational Software
OSLC - Lifecycle integration inspired by the web -> 
http://open-services.net

> From: Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/IBM at IBMUS
> To: oslc-core at open-services.net
> Date: 04/10/2014 03:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [oslc-core] Some issues with OSLC TRS 2.0 and alignment 
with 
> recent LDP spec changes
> Sent by: "Oslc-Core" <oslc-core-bounces at open-services.net>
> 
> I haven't received any feedback, so I'm going to progress with making 
these changes. 
> 
> Thanks,
> Steve Speicher
> IBM Rational Software
> OSLC - Lifecycle integration inspired by the web -> 
http://open-services.net 
> 
> > From: Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/IBM at IBMUS 
> > To: oslc-core at open-services.net 
> > Date: 03/30/2014 09:11 AM 
> > Subject: [oslc-core] Some issues with OSLC TRS 2.0 and alignment with 
recent
> > LDP spec changes 
> > Sent by: "Oslc-Core" <oslc-core-bounces at open-services.net> 
> > 
> > Current issues with October 2013 draft [1] compared with W3C LDP March 
2014 
> > draft [2] : 
> > 
> > 1. Base resources is a ldp:Container (should be ldp:DirectContainer) 
> > LDP WG resolved to no longer have a single general purpose 
ldp:Container 
> > that could exist on its own, instead it is a common base class to the 
> other 3 classes.
> > Proposal: change type to be ldp:DirectContainer 
> > Migration considerations: can always multi-type, add in 
ldp:DirectContainer 
> > and predicate settings along with ldp:Container 
> > Note: I don't think any consumer checks the type
> > 
> > 2. Base resources use default membership predicate rdfs:member, LDP 
> > recommends ldp:member 
> > Proposal: change to using ldp:member 
> > Migration considerations: impacts clients, to mitigate, could return 
both 
> > rdfs:member and ldp:member triples, OR equivalency statement such as 
> > ldp:member owl:sameAs rdfs:member, OR have clients have this inferred. 

> > Note: impact to clients is minimal, near 0, due to need to change a 
string 
> > and there are not many providers. 
> > 
> > I believe these issues should be address directly in the OSLC TRS 2.0 
spec, 
> > just announcing and making it clear these changes have been made.
> > 
> > [1]: 
http://open-services.net/wiki/core/TrackedResourceSet-2.0/revision/3806/ 
> > [2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-ldp-20140311/ 
> > Thanks,
> > Steve Speicher
> > IBM Rational Software
> > OSLC - Lifecycle integration inspired by the web -> 
http://open-services.net
> > _______________________________________________
> > Oslc-Core mailing list
> > Oslc-Core at open-services.net
> > http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net
> _______________________________________________
> Oslc-Core mailing list
> Oslc-Core at open-services.net
> http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/attachments/20140410/cb19bd1d/attachment-0003.html>