[oslc-core] Some issues with OSLC TRS 2.0 and alignment with recent LDP spec changes

Steve K Speicher sspeiche at us.ibm.com
Thu Apr 10 15:36:00 EDT 2014


I haven't received any feedback, so I'm going to progress with making 
these changes.

Thanks,
Steve Speicher
IBM Rational Software
OSLC - Lifecycle integration inspired by the web -> 
http://open-services.net

> From: Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/IBM at IBMUS
> To: oslc-core at open-services.net
> Date: 03/30/2014 09:11 AM
> Subject: [oslc-core] Some issues with OSLC TRS 2.0 and alignment with 
recent
> LDP spec changes
> Sent by: "Oslc-Core" <oslc-core-bounces at open-services.net>
> 
> Current issues with October 2013 draft [1] compared with W3C LDP March 
2014 
> draft [2] : 
> 
> 1. Base resources is a ldp:Container (should be ldp:DirectContainer) 
> LDP WG resolved to no longer have a single general purpose ldp:Container 

> that could exist on its own, instead it is a common base class to the 
other 3 classes.
> Proposal: change type to be ldp:DirectContainer 
> Migration considerations: can always multi-type, add in 
ldp:DirectContainer 
> and predicate settings along with ldp:Container 
> Note: I don't think any consumer checks the type
> 
> 2. Base resources use default membership predicate rdfs:member, LDP 
> recommends ldp:member 
> Proposal: change to using ldp:member 
> Migration considerations: impacts clients, to mitigate, could return 
both 
> rdfs:member and ldp:member triples, OR equivalency statement such as 
> ldp:member owl:sameAs rdfs:member, OR have clients have this inferred. 
> Note: impact to clients is minimal, near 0, due to need to change a 
string 
> and there are not many providers. 
> 
> I believe these issues should be address directly in the OSLC TRS 2.0 
spec, 
> just announcing and making it clear these changes have been made.
> 
> [1]: 
http://open-services.net/wiki/core/TrackedResourceSet-2.0/revision/3806/ 
> [2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-ldp-20140311/ 
> Thanks,
> Steve Speicher
> IBM Rational Software
> OSLC - Lifecycle integration inspired by the web -> 
http://open-services.net
> _______________________________________________
> Oslc-Core mailing list
> Oslc-Core at open-services.net
> http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/attachments/20140410/dd9b32cd/attachment-0003.html>


More information about the Oslc-Core mailing list