[oslc-core] +1 for new property oslc:shortId, OR revised recommendation on use of rdfs:label

[John Arwe]

+1

We have the need.  The syntax choice, medium preference to re-use existing 
vocabulary rather than inventing new.  Any existing vocabulary term 
compatible with our usage is fine.
Our "today" providers have not directly expressed this need, but I expect 
some in the near-term pipeline (a small number of months hence) will need 
it, if that helps with timeframe for resolution.

Best Regards, John

Voice US 845-435-9470  BluePages
Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/attachments/20130516/fce27ea4/attachment-0003.html>