[oslc-core] Issue 42 proposed resolution - UPDATED with language to remove error and add warning header
Martin P Pain
martinpain at uk.ibm.com
Tue Apr 16 04:52:01 EDT 2013
The text "The provider SHOULD NOT return an error (HTTP error status code
or OSLC error resource) when unsupported search properties are present" is
a little ambiguous - "The provider SHOULD NOT return an error (HTTP error
status code or OSLC error resource) as a result of unsupported search
properties being present" would be less so.
Martin
From: Michael F Fiedler <fiedler at us.ibm.com>
To: oslc-core at open-services.net,
Date: 15/04/2013 18:15
Subject: [oslc-core] Issue 42 proposed resolution - UPDATED with
language to remove error and add warning header
Sent by: "Oslc-Core" <oslc-core-bounces at open-services.net>
Revised proposed resolution for issue 42 which incorporates feedback from
last week's Core workgroup meeting. I am re-copying the issue summary
here - proposed resolution wording follows. The final two sentences are
the changed content.
====== SUMMARY ========
Core issue #42 [1] deals with service provider behavior when a consumer
requests selective properties or attempts to filter/search using
properties not known to the provider. The e-mail thread describes three
variations on the issue:
1. Client requests selective properties (oslc.select/oslc.properties)
defined as optional in the spec and which are not supported by the
provider [1]
2. Client requests selective properties not defined in the specification
[1]
3. Client tries to filter or search (oslc.where) using a property not
supported by the provider [2]
The issue was discussed on-list, in early 2012 workgroup meetings and it
appears some side meetings were held as well to investigate the behavior
of existing implementations. Based on the discussions, the following
informative text is proposed for the Core specification. The workgroup
should discuss the content and whether it goes in V2 or is deferred to V3.
====== PROPOSED RESOLUTION =======
To be inserted as a new sub-heading under "Unknown Properties and Content"
[3]
(This section is informative.)
A consumer can send an OSLC query with a request for selective properties
(oslc.properties, oslc.select) which the provider does not recognize.
These properties could be unsupported properties from an OSLC
specification or properties not included in an OSLC specification. When
unsupported selective properties are present in an OSLC query, the
provider is encouraged to ignore these properties and form the query
response as if they were not present. Other recognized selective
properties on the query should be honored.
A consumer can send an OSLC query with a a request to search on specific
properties (oslc.where) which the provider does not recognize. These
properties could be unsupported properties from an OSLC specification or
properties not included in an OSLC specification. When unsupported search
properties are present, the provider is encouraged to follow the semantics
of SPARQL WHERE as it relates to OSLC query (see:
http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/OslcSimpleQuerySparqlV1#Example_2_Searching_for_Resource
). If the property is not present in the RDF graph of resources queried,
no resources will match the query. The provider SHOULD NOT return an
error (HTTP error status code or OSLC error resource) when unsupported
search properties are present. The provider MAY include a standard HTTP
Warning header in the response to indicate that a search property is not
known or not supported.
[1] -
http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/2012-March/001257.html
[2] -
http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/2012-April/001287.html
[3] -
http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/OslcCoreSpecification#Unknown_properties_and_content
Regards,
Mike
Michael Fiedler
IBM Rational Software
fiedler at us.ibm.com
919-254-4170_______________________________________________
Oslc-Core mailing list
Oslc-Core at open-services.net
http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/attachments/20130416/8c29e4f8/attachment-0003.html>
More information about the Oslc-Core
mailing list