[oslc-core] Last call for comments Re: Proposed resolution for issue #42 - unknown selective and search properties in OSLC queries

[John Arwe]

What's here, I'm fine with.  I'm agnostic on 2.0 vs 3.0.

I think there is room for improvement in the sense of providers allowing 
clients to detect when part of their query was ignored (e.g. via a Warn: 
header), but my stake in the ground is that can be done as a separate 
future proposal if clients actually want it.  I.e. let's not allow the 
perfect to be the enemy of the good.

Best Regards, John

Voice US 845-435-9470  BluePages
Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/attachments/20130410/43ed0a00/attachment-0003.html>