[oslc-core] [Oslc-Automation] Request for review of OSLC Automation specification
Pramod K Chandoria
pchandor at in.ibm.com
Sun May 27 11:26:47 EDT 2012
I have few comments as mentioned below.
Automation plan: Can we just call it Automation. Do we gain any meaning
with plan.
Automation plan: We don't have oslc_auto:automationType attribute. Without
this we can't distinguish whether Automation is for build, test,
deployment, cloud etc.. I think this needs to be typed.
Automaton Request: oslc_auto:state - Probably it's value can be defined by
specification, rather loosely relying on the provider. This will allows
clients to write more predictable code rather writing specific code to
each provider. I think verdict domain can be different for different
provider but state of the Automation Request can be guided by
specification across all providers.
AutomationResult: oslc_auto:verdict is used for end result's verdict,
oslc_auto:state - I am not sure why this property is mandatory when
verdict is already available. In RQM there is only one field for verdict,
there is no other state for result. I am thinking this should not be
one-many but zero-many property.
Regards,
___________________________________________________________________________
-|- Pramod K Chandoria
Advisory Software Engineer
IBM Rational, India Software Lab
Bangalore, India | +91-80-417-77045 | +91 99805 68253
What's new in 4.0 RC0 | Ask Question in forum | Online Help | Download RQM
4.0 RC0
From: Michael F Fiedler <fiedler at us.ibm.com>
To: oslc-automation at open-services.net, oslc-core at open-services.net
Date: 05/08/2012 07:49 PM
Subject: [Oslc-Automation] Request for review of OSLC Automation
specification
Sent by: oslc-automation-bounces at open-services.net
The Automation workgroup continues to make progress on the specification
and is working to move towards convergence with several early
implementations beginning now.
The workgroup would like to invite you to review the current draft [1] of
the specification. All comments are welcome. We would especially be
interested in feedback from Core members and Automation members who have
not been in attendance lately.
[1] - http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/AutoSpecificationV2
Regards,
Mike
Michael Fiedler
IBM Rational Software
fiedler at us.ibm.com
919-254-4170_______________________________________________
Oslc-Automation mailing list
Oslc-Automation at open-services.net
http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-automation_open-services.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/attachments/20120527/ce28aa68/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 360 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/attachments/20120527/ce28aa68/attachment.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 3624 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/attachments/20120527/ce28aa68/attachment-0001.gif>
More information about the Oslc-Core
mailing list