[oslc-core] Request for May 30 agenda

Steve K Speicher sspeiche at us.ibm.com
Tue May 29 14:51:08 EDT 2012


Hey John,

I hope to have a bit more homework done on some outstanding core issues 
but doubt I'll get the level I need to in order to have a meaningful 
discussion.

With that, I see no reason why we can't discussion and review at the call 
tomorrow.  As you stated, this is not a new topic so we should be able to 
do a brief review and put up for approval.

Thanks,
Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software

> From: John Arwe/Poughkeepsie/IBM at IBMUS
> To: oslc-core at open-services.net, 
> Date: 05/29/2012 02:45 PM
> Subject: [oslc-core] Request for May 30 agenda
> Sent by: oslc-core-bounces at open-services.net
> 
> I would like to request Core approval to start up two new working groups 
to 
> produce domain specifications in the following areas.  In both cases, 
> parties (currently non-members) have indicated offline that they would 
be 
> interested in working on these issues in the context of the OSLC 
community. 
> 
> 
> [1] Resource Reconciliation WG 
> 
> Does a monitoring record about a computer system and an asset record 
about a
> computer system, taken together, describe one or two computer systems? 
This 
> is a central issue when the resources described are not themselves 
> electronic documents, be they computer systems, software applications, 
HTTP 
> servers, whatever. 
> 
> The goal of this effort would be to define a common set of resources, 
> properties, and constraints on property values useful for answering that 

> category of question, so that multiple tools can have a common 
understanding
> of the answer when they integrate. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [2] Event Management WG 
> 
> What events does an event management system contain about a computer 
system?
> Once a human decides that an event occurred "because of" some other 
event, 
> or that an event "is about" a particular network device, how can another 

> product link to details about the event? 
> 
> The goal of this effort would be to define a common set of resources, 
> properties, and RESTful services useful for answering that category of 
> question, so that multiple tools can have a common answer when they 
integrate. 
> [1]  http://open-services.net/forums/viewthread/42/
> [2]  http://open-services.net/forums/viewthread/41/ 
> Best Regards, John
> 
> Voice US 845-435-9470  BluePages 
> Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario 
> _______________________________________________
> Oslc-Core mailing list
> Oslc-Core at open-services.net
> http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net





More information about the Oslc-Core mailing list