[oslc-core] Fw: what is the actual intent of resource definition table columns?

[Arthur Ryman]

Steve,

Thx for the clarification.

Regards,
___________________________________________________________________________
                                                               
 Arthur Ryman                                                  
                                                               
 DE, Chief Architect, Reporting &                              
                                                               
 Portfolio Strategy and Management                             
                                                               
 IBM Software, Rational                                        
                                                               
 Toronto Lab | +1-905-413-3077 (office) |                      
 +1-416-939-5063 (mobile)                                      
                                                               




|------------>
| From:      |
|------------>
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/IBM at IBMUS                                                                                                                |
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| To:        |
|------------>
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM at IBMCA                                                                                                                    |
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Cc:        |
|------------>
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |oslc-core at open-services.net                                                                                                                       |
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Date:      |
|------------>
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |05/15/2012 02:12 PM                                                                                                                               |
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Subject:   |
|------------>
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Re: [oslc-core] Fw: what is the actual intent of resource	definition	table	columns?                                                            |
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|




I don't think we are far off from saying the same things.  I tried to
elaborate a bit below....

> From: Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM at IBMCA
> To: Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/IBM at IBMUS,
> Cc: oslc-core at open-services.net
> Date: 04/20/2012 02:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [oslc-core] Fw: what is the actual intent of resource
> definition table columns?
>
> Steve,
>
> My reply is [1]. I think I disagree with you.
>
> For Example 2, the occurence constraint is one or many. Therefore zero is
NOT allowed.

I agree. I just misread it as zero-or-more

> For Example 3, Either means that both representations are valid, i.e. the

> resource is "inlined" or just references via URI. Both client and server
> must be able to handle both representations.

Ok, we are arguing over MUST or MAY on this one.  So I agree that when a
server advertises its support via the resource shape then it MUST support
this.  I was taking the original "informative" approach to tables within
the specification, which I do not think we can treat as a MUST.

>
> [1] http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/2012-
> April/001299.html
>
> Regards,
>
___________________________________________________________________________
>
> Arthur Ryman

- Steve
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/attachments/20120515/5b8d8bb6/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 2A062302.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 360 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/attachments/20120515/5b8d8bb6/attachment.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ecblank.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 45 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/attachments/20120515/5b8d8bb6/attachment-0001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: graycol.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 105 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/attachments/20120515/5b8d8bb6/attachment-0002.gif>